From the Editors

METRO editors blog about public transit issues, news and events. Join the conversation with your comments.

Back to the list

January 26, 2011

SOTU gives glimpse of tomorrow’s rail, but what about transit today?

by Nicole Schlosser - Also by this author

Looking to the future and making exciting, inspirational and, maybe, even sometimes grandiose claims of what can be and the “big things” we are capable of when we all work together, is part and parcel of almost every State of the Union Address, and it seems we Americans are more than willing to eat it up nearly every time.

Having said that, I thought President Obama’s State of the Union Address last night was great. I liked his emphasis on innovation as a crucial tool for making the U.S. more competitive. I was glad to hear that he is calling for Congress to cut the “billions in taxpayer dollars” our government hands out to oil companies. “I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but they’re doing just fine on their own,” he quipped. “So, instead of subsidizing yesterday’s energy, let’s invest in tomorrow’s.”

And, he did point out that, being the nation that “built the transcontinental railroad; brought electricity to rural communities; and constructed the interstate highway system, which created jobs not by just laying down tracks or pavement” but by enabling businesses to “open near a town’s new train station or the new off-ramp,” the U.S. has continued its progress “rebuilding for the 21st century” by replacing our well-worn roads and bridges.

And, he included high-speed rail in that plan. “Within 25 years, our goal is to give 80 percent of Americans access to high-speed rail, which could allow you [to] go places in half the time it takes to travel by car,” he said. “For some trips, it will be faster than flying – without the pat-down.” 

So, public transportation was cited as an important piece of tomorrow’s thrilling innovations, which will make us more successful and competitive. And, the cameras trained on Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood for a few seconds, which was also exciting.

“Hey, that’s Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood!” I got to say to my husband, before the caption came up, saying who he was. “I write about that guy!”

Still, as happy as I was with the high-speed rail plug, and all the other “big things” we will do in the future, I was left wondering about the now. What about public transportation right this minute and its need for support, with so many states still struggling and unemployment still sinking ridership in many places? I wish that a few words could have been afforded for supporting our existing transit system.

What do you think?

Nicole Schlosser

Senior Editor


Write a letter to the editor
deli.cio.us digg it stumble upon newsvine


  • Hans Hammarquist[ January 27th, 2011 @ 5:05am ]

    High speed, high speed, high speed! It doesn't matter. A ride of 200 miles will still be dominated by the trip to the station of departure and station of arrival (unless you live and work next to the stations). 200 mph train plus 1 hour cab ride to and from result in a total 3 hour travel. Add so that you have to observe the train schedule and you still make it in a 65 mph car. Well, how about give some money to develop a much more efficient PRT (personal rapid transit) system. They can be built for a speed of 100 mph and you decide when to travel. Why are we still insisting throughing in billions of $$ at this outdated technology?

E-NEWSLETTER

Receive the latest Metro E-Newsletters in your inbox!

Join the Metro E-Newsletters and receive the latest news in your e-mail inbox once a week. SIGN UP NOW!

View the latest eNews
Express Tuesday | Express Thursday | University Transit

Author Bio

Janna Starcic

Executive Editor


Alex Roman

Managing Editor


Nicole Schlosser

Senior Editor


White Papers

Mass Transit Capital Planning An overview of the world-class best practices for assessing, prioritizing, and funding capital projects to optimize resources and align with the organization’s most critical immediate and long-term goals.

The Benefits of Door-to-Door Service in ADA Complementary Paratransit Many U.S. transit agencies continue to struggle with the quality of ADA service, the costs, and the difficulties encountered in contracting the service, which is the method of choice for a significant majority of agencies. One of the most basic policy decisions an agency must make involves whether to provide door-to-door, or only curb-to-curb service.

Mass transit mobile Wi-Fi & the public sector case study How Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority successfully implemented Wi-Fi on its light rail and bus lines

More white papers


STORE
METRO Magazine - May 2013

METRO Magazine
Here are the Highlight:
  • Denver RTD’s Innovation Fuels Transit Expansion
  • Bus Maintenance Survey
  • Partnerships, Trip Subsidies Help Curb Paratransit Costs
    And much more…
  •  
    DIGITAL EDITION

    The full contents of Metro Magazine on your computer! The digital edition is an exact replica of the print magazine with enhanced search, multimedia and hyperlink features. View the current issue