From the Editors

METRO editors blog about public transit issues, news and events. Join the conversation with your comments.

Back to the list

April 13, 2011

California: The last hope for high-speed rail


By  Alex Roman

It would be nice to not have to discuss federal funding for a change. I mean, wouldn't you like to wake up one day just knowing that there is a high-speed rail system on its way or that your bus or train was going to be at its stop or station instead of being cut? Yeah, me too.

The bad news continued to roll in late last week, when a government shutdown was narrowly averted thanks to U.S. House and Senate leaders negotiating a deal to fund government operations through the remainder of FY 2011, reducing spending by $38.5 billion from FY 2010 levels. The continuing resolution (CR) is good until Friday, giving Congress time to finalize a bill before a vote.

The bill includes a total subcommittee discretionary budget authority allocation for Transportation, Housing and Urban Development of $55.5 billion in FY 2011, a reduction of 18 percent from FY 2010 numbers. It also eliminated FY 2011 funding for the high-speed rail program, which was funded at $2.5 billion in FY 2010, and rescinded $400 million from FY 2010, thus eliminating the possibility that Florida's high-speed rail funds will be redistributed.

Yesterday I had a chance to visit the California High-Speed Rail Authority's Request for Expressions of Interest (REFI) Industry Forum in Los Angeles and there was tons of optimism in the air. Without Governors grandstanding to reject "wasteful" high-speed spending, California continues to move ahead with its high-speed rail project and is preparing to award $5.5 billion in contracts for the first leg of its system, which is set to be completed by 2017.  

During the REFI Forum, the Authority's plan was to bring together private sector representatives and provide an overview of the project, an in-depth look at the procurement process, and opportunities for potential prime and subcontractors to discuss the project, as well as for small businesses to become "certified" and learn more about participating.

Judging from the crowd of close to 2,000 people, the event was successful and quite positive for high-speed rail proponents that are concerned about the diminishing federal investment. It seems that California has a plan in place to make high-speed rail work, complete with a referendum passed by voters to fund approximately one-third of the project costs, federally guaranteed investments and private sector investments. The Authority is hopeful that the model of cash positive high-speed rail systems around the world, will allow it to operate at a profit.

If all goes well, California will end up being the first state to successfully implement a high-speed rail system and do so without too much further concern about the investment made by the feds, which must be nice. At the very least, California, some two-plus years after high-speed was labeled as the "future" by President Obama, is the last hope for true high-speed rail to become a reality somewhere in the U.S.   

In case you missed it...

Read our METRO blog, "What would a government shutdown mean for transit?" here.

 


Write a letter to the editor
Tags:
deli.cio.us digg it stumble upon newsvine


  • Steve Ly[ April 13th, 2011 @ 12:11pm ]

    After your visit to the California High-Speed Rail Authority's Request for Expressions of Interest (REFI) Industry Forum, you should have reviewed the reports from such dispassionate entities as the California State Auditor, the non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office, UC Berkeley's Institute of Transportation Studies and a peer review group of transportation experts organized by the California State Legislature. None of these entities could be confused for right-wing Republicans, yet each has identified problems with the rail authority's plans and assumptions and giving ammunition of the project's critics, many of whom voted for the 2008 HSR bond proposition and now regret doing so. This blog post would have been much stronger had you provided an impartial analysis of these reports along with your CHSRA boosterism.

  • Faithful Conservative[ April 13th, 2011 @ 12:22pm ]

    I disagree with you. We don't need more rail, we need more roads. Buses do just fine on roads. Airports are already doing the job that only a few people want rail to do. Doesn't it make more sense to add more high speed buses on some dedicated bus lanes that could double as car lanes when not used for buses? That is the most efficient use of dollars without becoming socialist. Roads are already paid for with gas taxes and user fees. Rail is subsidized.

  • Rail Fan[ April 13th, 2011 @ 1:08pm ]

    I love trains and have ridden HSR in France and Spain. But, I don't believe that there is a ghost of a chance the California HSR will get built for less than $100B--or more than 2X the current official estimate. The proponents fail to explain how the financing will come together, how HSR will make money, and why there won't be deficits as far as the eye can see. For example, they are projecting 30 million annual riders. That's as many annual riders as the entire Amtrak system carries across the USA. The HSR authority has yet to submit an investment grade business plan demanded by the legislature. Without such a business plan they will not attract private investment. Without private investment, there will be no HSR. Sure, there were 1000+ companies expressing an interest in the project this year. But,they want to be on the receiving end of government largesse. They have no intention of investing private dollars. I sure wish this was a viable project. But, I cannot envision a way to make it so.

  • Ruy[ May 3rd, 2011 @ 7:04pm ]

    What are the opposing views of this? Will there be farmers who have land in the way of the routes? Have the routes been set out to where homes will not be destroyed and removed?

  • Suckafish[ May 4th, 2011 @ 12:28pm ]

    The biggest problem to Ca growth is affordable housing. Too many people are living farther and farther away, HSR would improve quality of life, allowing people to live farther and commute almost anywhere given current times. Safe green growth in CA is assured with HSR, yes it will be expensive and gov. subsidized, but all good measures are. This is a quality of life issue that will help out many Americans, who wants to wait an hour to fly, security checks, etc. when you can walk on a train and be there in the time it takes you to get through security. Amtrak is not viable because of the speed, HSR is the only answer to long term green california growth.

  • Steve Ly[ May 18th, 2011 @ 2:47pm ]

    Since this blog was written, the California Legislative Analyst's Office has released another critical report on high speed rail: http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2011/trns/high_speed_rail/high_speed_rail_051011.pdf Too many impartial sources agree that this project is seriously flawed. The new report confirms that the project cost will greatly exceed the $42 billion claimed by CHSRA. It's time to pull the plug before any more money is wasted.

E-NEWSLETTER

Receive the latest Metro E-Newsletters in your inbox!

Join the Metro E-Newsletters and receive the latest news in your e-mail inbox once a week. SIGN UP NOW!

View the latest eNews
Express Tuesday | Express Thursday | University Transit

Author Bio

Alex Roman

Managing Editor


Janna Starcic

Executive Editor


Nicole Schlosser

Senior Editor


White Papers

Hazard Analysis: The Practice of Using Cell Phones While Operating a Transit Vehicle Examining system safety principles, available information in the public domain, recent transit incidents and policies.

More white papers


STORE
METRO Magazine - April 2013

METRO Magazine
Here are the Highlight:
  • BRT Survey: Coordination Construction Top Challenges
  • Hydrogen Fuel Cells Gather Steam as Viable Fleet Option
  • Alternative Project Delivery Opens Doors to Innovation
    And much more…
  •  
    DIGITAL EDITION

    The full contents of Metro Magazine on your computer! The digital edition is an exact replica of the print magazine with enhanced search, multimedia and hyperlink features. View the current issue