From the Editors

METRO editors blog about public transit issues, news and events. Join the conversation with your comments.

Back to the list

April 20, 2012

Is aim to end transit violence with Tasers misguided?

by Nicole Schlosser

One news story reported this week that raised a few eyebrows around our office and got a few retweets was about a New York state Senator who wants to train bus drivers, subway contractors, and commuter rail and Amtrak crew members, to use Tasers in order to fend off attacks from passengers. Sen. Eric Adams is a retired NYPD captain who has no doubt seen his share of violent situations.

Has it really come to this, though? We have reported on the increasing violence experienced by bus drivers, and so it seems that giving them another tool to defend themselves and help protect passengers is a good idea. However, some argue that using a Taser is excessive force because it temporarily immobilizes a person through electroshock and can cause cardiac arrhythmia leading to heart attacks or even death in some cases. Despite efforts to train employees, in a heated situation they may act on impulse and use the weapon when not absolutely necessary.

We have seen this before. In 2009, a man died in the Los Angeles subway station after being stunned multiple times with a Taser, after charging and attempting to hit an officer. In 2008, we reported that the Greater Vancouver Transit Authority (TransLink) Police Service was investigated for allegedly using Tasers on riders evading fares. However, each use of the Taser was reviewed and found to be appropriate.  

Sen. Adams claims that training transit workers to use the weapons “will end the assaults” and be “a strong deterrent against crime against our riders on the buses and trains,” according to New York Daily News. Additionally, the Transport Workers Union Local 100 supports the proposal, saying that more than 1,000 transit workers are attacked each year, and Livery Base Owners, a business association, asked the Taxi and Limousine Commission to let drivers bring guns to work for protection against violent passengers.

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly shot down both ideas, saying the weapons take a lot of training and are only given to sergeants and Emergency Services Unit officers. Both the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Taxi and Limousine Commission have indicated they are not on board either.

Michigan’s state House doesn’t agree, though. It just passed a three-bill package allowing citizens with a concealed pistol license to carry a Taser, The Detroit News reported. Michigan lawmakers are also reviewing a bill that would expedite the process for obtaining a concealed weapon permit and let some licensed gun owners with additional training to carry concealed pistols in typically pistol-free zones, such as schools, hospitals and bars. Meanwhile, according to The Detroit News, Amnesty International reported that at least 13 people have died in Michigan since 2001 after being shocked by a Taser during an arrest or while in jail.

I am all for preventing violence against transit workers and passengers, but I wonder whether the use of a weapon like a Taser is really the answer. Do you think Tasers will help drivers mitigate attacks?

In case you missed it...

Read our METRO blog, "Take me out to the ballgame on transit" here.

Nicole Schlosser

Senior Editor

Write a letter to the editor digg it stumble upon newsvine

  • Dale Madison[ April 20th, 2012 @ 6:27pm ]

    Tasers have created problems for police departments in North America. Several people have lost their lives after being taser'ed by police. Extreme caution should be exercised.


Receive the latest Metro E-Newsletters in your inbox!

Join the Metro E-Newsletters and receive the latest news in your e-mail inbox once a week. SIGN UP NOW!

View the latest eNews
Express Tuesday | Express Thursday | University Transit

Author Bio

Janna Starcic

Executive Editor

Alex Roman

Managing Editor

White Papers

Factors in Transit Bus Ramp Slope and Wheelchair-Seated Passenger Safety Nearly 3 million U.S. adults are wheelchair or scooter users1, and as the population ages this number is expected to rise. Many wheelchair users rely upon public transportation to access work, medical care, school and social activities.

Mass Transit Capital Planning An overview of the world-class best practices for assessing, prioritizing, and funding capital projects to optimize resources and align with the organization’s most critical immediate and long-term goals.

The Benefits of Door-to-Door Service in ADA Complementary Paratransit Many U.S. transit agencies continue to struggle with the quality of ADA service, the costs, and the difficulties encountered in contracting the service, which is the method of choice for a significant majority of agencies. One of the most basic policy decisions an agency must make involves whether to provide door-to-door, or only curb-to-curb service.

More white papers


The full contents of Metro Magazine on your computer! The digital edition is an exact replica of the print magazine with enhanced search, multimedia and hyperlink features. View the current issue