School is in session, ridership is on the rise and social media interactions are blossoming.
The Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District (MTD) provides service to two cities, one village and the University of Illinois (UI). While the population of our district classifies us as a small to mid-level service provider, the addition of the 15th largest university in the country transforms MTD. Last year, we had another record ridership year with more than 12 million rides.
During the UI’s Fall and Spring semesters, demand swells and MTD provides nearly 24/7 service. Our bus service feels the crunch during peak times, but many evening and weekend trips also turn into standing room only as students pour into the community for shopping and recreation.
The return of more than 42,000 students also means increased traffic on our social media sites. In 2010, MTD launched profiles on Facebook and Twitter, as well as media sharing sites YouTube and Flickr. A weekly blog and bi-monthly enewsletter round out our social online presence.
Super fans, transit geeks, bus nerds — whatever you want to call them — find MTD on these platforms. Engagement occurs year-round, but the wired and tech-savvy population of the university increases engagement levels.
As the primary manager of MTD’s social media pages, I am acquainted with user names and avatars. I memorize Twitter handles and recognize faces. Some engagers I only interact with once; others I chat with regularly and have met IRL (in real life).
The one-timers often reach out to MTD because they have a question or want to report a negative experience. We value these users. Complaints are an opportunity to provide customer service, educate and improve our system.
The return of more than 42,000 students to the University of Illinois for the Fall semester means an increased demand in ridership and a significant spike in traffic on its social media sites, including Twitter.
The many-timers are not only transit advocates but tremendous resources. They are extra eyes on the street as they report issues like destination sign errors and corrections to bus stop shelter boards. They also narrate their day-to-day experiences and remind us what makes our service public.
This pool of repeat socializers comes in handy. In 2011, MTD did a complete redesign of our website. We put together focus groups, and thanks to our social media connections, were able to gather a diverse group of regular users from all over the community.
When it came time to renew MTD’s service contract with the UI, we conducted student focus groups. We opened the opportunity to all, but a number of the participants came from social media.
MTD is fortunate to have CAD/AVL (computer aided dispatch/automatic vehicle locator) technology fleet-wide. While we’ve had the system since 2003, updated and new equipment can challenge the integrity of the data. Recently, our planners were testing a new feature and needed trip data as users got it on the street. From their apps, through text messages, and at the stop digital displays, we needed to know how the time displayed compared with the real-life departure of the bus.
I sent direct messages on social media to our most detail-oriented riders asking them if they would participate in "Operation: Ground Truth Investigation." We asked them to fill out a Google form each time they rode the bus. The form detailed the trip, times, information source and actual bus departure.
MTD used social media to reach out to its most detail-oriented riders, asking them to participate in an assessment of how its real-time arrival information was displaying compared with the actual bus departures.
We contacted five users and they all agreed to participate. At the end of the two-week collection period, they submitted information on 78 individual trips. The data they submitted proved the added feature was working effectively.
Currently, MTD is updating our strategic plan. To gather external input on the district’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats we (you guessed it) used our online connections to solicit survey responses.
The frequent online interactions encourage in-person engagement, too. At our last public hearing on proposed service improvements, a small group of super fans showed up. They were all wearing the same lavender colored shirt with the numbers and letters “30 Lavender” screen printed on the back. They came to advocate to MTD’s board of trustees and staff for more service on our Lavender route. While MTD does not currently have the funds to provide the weekday evening and Sunday service the riders want, their attendance sparked great conversation and helps hone our priorities for the future.
Through social media, riders and non-riders see that MTD is a transparent organization that is always listening. They are inclined to repay that care through focus group attendance, completing surveys and keeping in touch.
In case you missed it...
Read our METRO blog, "SEPTA offers a different type of school bus"
While PTC may have just recently entered the consciousness of the public at-large, it has been an issue for freight and commuter rail systems since Congress passed the Rail Safety Improvement Act (RSIA) (P.L. 110-432) in 2008 following the collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train in Los Angeles. Since that time, rail organizations have been working toward meeting the federally-mandated PTC implementation deadline of December 31, 2015. With less than six months to go, several commuter rail systems have said that, not only will they not meet the deadline, they will need several more years before having full PTC implementation on their trains.
Disruptive technologies and the new era of information sharing are helping to evolve and advance public transportation in our nation’s greatest cities. Nearly 300 mayors and government officials convened in San Francisco June 19-22 for the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ 83rd Annual Meeting, featuring remarks from President Obama and former U.S. Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. I was invited to speak in front of these influential government leaders to discuss “Technology and the Transformation of Urban Transportation.” This article will give readers an inside look at the conversation.
In times of disaster or tragedy, public transit agencies are frequently called upon to assist their communities and other transportation organizations. In case of fire, evacuation or accident, buses may be used to shelter or transport the displaced or injured, or serve as a respite site for first responders.
As a city, Leipzig is an excellent example of the German principals of transport planning and service as well as eastern Germany’s long history. The city has benefitted from large amounts of investment in infrastructure over the years since German reunification and most transport systems seem to be new or rebuilt, expanded and in a very good current state of repair. The most notable element in the transport mix is inevitably the enormous and historic main railway station, which is one of the largest, but certainly not busiest, in Europe.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s Regional (commuter) Rail system was inherited from the Pennsylvania and Reading Railroads and the infrastructure in many sections of the system has been serving the Philadelphia area for more than 100 years. Fifteen years ago, overhead catenary system (OCS) failures were a common occurrence on SEPTA Regional Rail, a result of fatigue cracks and wear. The all too common OCS failures were frustrating for SEPTA customers who occasionally found it difficult to depend on train service for their travels and for SEPTA, whose crews were constantly working to repair and maintain the system.