(This story by Paul Goddin, was original published by Mobility Lab.)
Contestant Earl Kaing addresses the Outside the Box judges.
Transit would be better served if the pay-per-ride and unlimited fare structures that currently dominate were expanded to include more fine-tuned pricing structures similar to those offered by cell phone companies.
That was the idea that won the recent second annual Outside the Box transportation conference and competition at George Mason University’s (GMU’s) School of Public Policy.
Winner Adam Davidson, a Ph.D. student and Mobility Lab contributor, imagined transit fare plans that, similar to mobile phone carriers, might include “free nights and weekends” (that is, free off-peak rides). He was persuasive in arguing that such a scheme would suit different user needs better than the current system, incentivize transit use and increase customer satisfaction.
Contest winner Adam Davidson.
Davidson demonstrated how a “transit virtual network operator” could buy fares in bulk and re-sell them to customers similar to the manner in which Boost Mobile re-brands and sells minutes on Sprint’s mobile network.
“We have the technology, we just need enabling legislation," Davidson said. His plan also allows for the potential of inter-jurisdictional fare plans, which would certainly be welcomed by many transit riders.
A blue ribbon panel of judges — venture capitalist Hooks Johnston of Valhalla Partners, former Virginia Secretary of Transportation John Milliken Esq., and VP of Policy for American Public Transportation Association Art Guzzetti — narrowed the panelists down to three, who presented their transportation policy innovations.
The second-place winner of the competition was Danny Yoder, a masters of planning student at Rutgers. He explained to Mobility Lab that his entry, called SocialTransit, is “Foursquare for transit vehicles.”
Allowing transit customers to “check in” to moving trains or buses, Yoder explained how his app would link up with social networks such as Facebook, allowing social interactions among transit riders. Gamification, according to Yoder, would incentivize use of the app, which in turn would incentivize transit use and promote customer loyalty.
Secondarily, use of Yoder’s app would result in useful data regarding delays, congestion, and the ride experience, similar to the information crowd-sourced by users of Waze. Yoder estimated production of his app would cost $72,000 over 24 weeks for production of his app (Co-applicant Dorothy Kieu Le was not present at the presentation at GMU).
The third-place winner was Earl Kaing, a transportation planner at San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.
Kaing’s entry started with an implementation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), replete with dedicated right-of-way. Next, Kaing opened up the dedicated BRT lanes to permit the use of taxis and transportation network companies (TNCs), such as Uber and Lyft to utilize the dedicated lanes. Congestion pricing for TNCs plus taxi credits for bus riders could be utilized to control the quantities of each service on the roads. Kaing predicted that his plan would result in a decline in single-occupancy vehicle use and car ownership.
In addition to the three contest finalists, the event also featured keynote speaker Gil Penalosa, who discussed his experience in transforming automobile-centric places into pedestrian-oriented, vibrant communities.
Penalosa, former commissioner of Bogotá, Colombia, called his mission one of “dignifying the pedestrian.” Penalosa is currently executive director of 8-80 Cities, which claims that cities designed for eight-year-olds and 80-year-olds work for everyone. Penalosa said that we need to “stop building cities as though everyone was 30 and athletic.” Graduate students in GMU’s Transportation Policy, Operations and Logistics (TPOL) program have recommended adoption of the eight-80 Cities concept in Arlington County, Virginia.The winner of last year’s Outside the Box event, Josephine Kressner, Ph.D.
, updated the audience on her recent developments. In the past year, Kressner has completed her Ph.D., patented her concept (a new way to perform travel-demand modeling using location-based mobile phone data) and started a company called Transport Foundry
. She’s currently hiring researchers for her feasibility study and can be contacted via email
Sponsored by the family of the late Cameron Rian Hays, a George Mason University student whose life was cut short prior to graduation, Outside the Box celebrates Hays’ interest in transportation and his penchant for innovative thought.
“We want to stimulate innovation in this area,” said Brian Hays, Cameron’s father. “It’s not just about building better infrastructure, it’s about building a better country.”
Photos by M.V. Jantzen
While PTC may have just recently entered the consciousness of the public at-large, it has been an issue for freight and commuter rail systems since Congress passed the Rail Safety Improvement Act (RSIA) (P.L. 110-432) in 2008 following the collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train in Los Angeles. Since that time, rail organizations have been working toward meeting the federally-mandated PTC implementation deadline of December 31, 2015. With less than six months to go, several commuter rail systems have said that, not only will they not meet the deadline, they will need several more years before having full PTC implementation on their trains.
Disruptive technologies and the new era of information sharing are helping to evolve and advance public transportation in our nation’s greatest cities. Nearly 300 mayors and government officials convened in San Francisco June 19-22 for the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ 83rd Annual Meeting, featuring remarks from President Obama and former U.S. Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. I was invited to speak in front of these influential government leaders to discuss “Technology and the Transformation of Urban Transportation.” This article will give readers an inside look at the conversation.
In times of disaster or tragedy, public transit agencies are frequently called upon to assist their communities and other transportation organizations. In case of fire, evacuation or accident, buses may be used to shelter or transport the displaced or injured, or serve as a respite site for first responders.
As a city, Leipzig is an excellent example of the German principals of transport planning and service as well as eastern Germany’s long history. The city has benefitted from large amounts of investment in infrastructure over the years since German reunification and most transport systems seem to be new or rebuilt, expanded and in a very good current state of repair. The most notable element in the transport mix is inevitably the enormous and historic main railway station, which is one of the largest, but certainly not busiest, in Europe.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s Regional (commuter) Rail system was inherited from the Pennsylvania and Reading Railroads and the infrastructure in many sections of the system has been serving the Philadelphia area for more than 100 years. Fifteen years ago, overhead catenary system (OCS) failures were a common occurrence on SEPTA Regional Rail, a result of fatigue cracks and wear. The all too common OCS failures were frustrating for SEPTA customers who occasionally found it difficult to depend on train service for their travels and for SEPTA, whose crews were constantly working to repair and maintain the system.