Bus

Public transportation’s green benefits get lost in D.C. debate

Posted on March 15, 2012 by Frank Di Giacomo, Publisher

About the only thing that both parties in Congress are able to agree on as they debate a new transportation bill is that public transportation projects should have one less step for reviewing environmental and other requirements. Both they and the Administration agree that federal review of projects before they go into an alternatives analysis, which has included an extra step of environmental review, should end. That's not because both sides agree that transit is good for the environment, rather, it's because there is a consensus that projects should have fewer strings attached to their eligibility for funds. However, now is a good time for reminding everyone that public transportation, while helping to reduce transportation-related pollution also creates good jobs and reduces our dependence on unstable oil supplies overseas.

Fewer hoops to jump through Supporters of public transportation want to see fewer hoops for projects to jump through so that more get built. Opponents of federal funding of public transportation see this as a cynical buy-off — cutting costs, something that the industry can support, while cutting available funding. Either that, or they don't particularly care.
Increasingly, the same ideologues who see no federal role for public transportation also want environmental regulations to end for everyone. This is because they see environmental rules as unnecessary barriers not just to projects funded with government dollars, but also, to any economic activity. This is from the same people who think that there is no link between human behavior and climate change, or at the very least, is the price to pay for our modern technology, much like pollution, and we can't do anything about it, especially in a global economy.

Good for the environment
What seems weird, though, is that the discussion of public transportation as being good for the environment has been left out of the conversation entirely. Opponents often ignore all of the positive aspects of public transportation, either because they don't really care about the environment or they don't believe that public transportation can be good for both the economy and the environment. Supporters need to remind them, perhaps now more than ever, as funding for our industry continues to be threatened.

They need to be reminded that at least 100 million more people will live in the U.S. in a few short decades — within some regional long-range planning cycles even now under way. That's the equivalent of another California, New York, Florida and Texas, combined. Where will they work and live? How will we manage the congestion, pollution and resource needs that come with that many more people?

Public transportation may not have all the answers, but making sure our industry is fully capitalized is one of the few obvious things that our elected officials can do, now. We need to remind them of that sustainability - which also happens to be a pretty good business case, too.

View comments or post a comment on this story. (0 Comments)

More News

UTA takes delivery of Provo/Orem BRT bus

The New Flyer Xcelsior 60-foot articulated bus is the first to be delivered and will now go through a thorough testing process.

FTA makes $226M in grants available to improve transit bus service

All projects must comply with Buy America regulations, which require that all iron, steel, or manufactured products be produced in the U.S., as well as final assembly of vehicles.

WSP USA designing BRT system for TriMet

The 14-mile Division Transit Project will provide an improved high-capacity connection between downtown Portland and the City of Gresham via Division Street.

New Flyer to supply 14 60-foot articulated buses to Brampton Transit

The vehicles will be delivered starting Q1 2018.

Valley Metro to add 187 ElDorado, New Flyer buses

All vehicles are funded by Federal Transit Administration and a half-cent sales tax that funds the Regional Transportation Plan in Maricopa County, which was approved by voters in 2004.

See More News

Post a Comment

Post Comment

Comments (0)

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment

TruckingInfo.com

THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK INDUSTRY’S MOST IN-DEPTH INFORMATION SOURCE

Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

LCT Magazine

Global Resource For Limousine and Bus Transportation

Please sign in or register to .    Close