December 12, 2013

6 public-private teams compete to build Md. light rail

Purple Line rendering courtesy MTA

Purple Line rendering courtesy MTA
Six private-sector teams are competing to design, build, construct, finance, operate and maintain Maryland's light rail Purple Line, according to state officials.

Following a thorough review of all the responses, Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT)/Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) will announce a short list of teams in January, who will be invited to submit formal proposals in early summer. In late 2014 or early 2015, MDOT/MTA will select a preferred partner and recommend the final agreement to the Board of Public Works for their review and approval. Construction could begin in spring 2015.

“Our intent is to short list as many as four teams to ensure competition and innovation in the Purple Line project,” said Maryland Transit Administrator Robert L. Smith. “The Maryland Transit Administration will continue to play a prominent role through every phase of this project and will remain very engaged with all communities along the route.”

Last month, the Board of Public Works gave its approval to deliver the Purple Line through a P3. In the P3 delivery method, a single private partner will be responsible for providing private financing to design, construct, operate and maintain the project. This innovative project delivery method differs from a typical project in which the state hires a contractor to design and construct a transit line and then MTA operates the system.

The Baltimore Light Rail Line was built using this traditional delivery method. Lt. Governor Anthony G. Brown led the administration’s efforts to successfully pass legislation this past session that establishes a framework for P3 solicitations.

The Purple Line is a 16-mile light rail line that runs east-west inside the Capital Beltway between Bethesda in Montgomery County and New Carrollton in Prince George’s County, with 21 stations planned that will provide direct connections to Metrorail’s Orange Line, Green Line and two branches of the Red Line, and the MARC Brunswick, Camden and Penn Lines.

The total project cost is $2.2 billion, which is being funded by a combination of federal, state and local governments. Passage of the Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act of 2013 added $711 million in state funds for design and construction of the Purple Line to MTA’s six-year capital budget (FY 2014–FY 2019).

By having the team who builds it also responsible for long-term operations and maintenance, the team has greater incentive to manage risks and design a project that is well operated and maintained over the long term, according to officials.

In return for operating, maintaining, refurbishing / replacing equipment and financing a portion of construction for the Purple Line, the MTA will pay the contractor annual payments once the line is operating. Deductions will be made from the payments if the contractor does not meet pre-determined performance targets, such as on-time performance, vehicle cleanliness and customer service. The MTA will be responsible for setting fares.

The Purple Line solicitation includes provisions to realize economic benefits for Marylanders, including goals for participation in construction, operations and maintenance by Disadvantaged Businesses Enterprises; encouragement to purchase equipment manufactured in the U.S.; agreements to assure labor peace; and encouragement to provide wages and benefits that compare with existing operations in Maryland.

More information on the project and competitive solicitation process can be found at www.purplelinemd.com.
 

deli.cio.us digg it stumble upon newsvine
[ Request More Info about this product / service / company ]


E-NEWSLETTER

Receive the latest Metro E-Newsletters in your inbox!

Join the Metro E-Newsletters and receive the latest news in your e-mail inbox once a week. SIGN UP NOW!

View the latest eNews
Express Tuesday | Express Thursday | University Transit

White Papers

Mass Transit Capital Planning An overview of the world-class best practices for assessing, prioritizing, and funding capital projects to optimize resources and align with the organization’s most critical immediate and long-term goals.

The Benefits of Door-to-Door Service in ADA Complementary Paratransit Many U.S. transit agencies continue to struggle with the quality of ADA service, the costs, and the difficulties encountered in contracting the service, which is the method of choice for a significant majority of agencies. One of the most basic policy decisions an agency must make involves whether to provide door-to-door, or only curb-to-curb service.

Mass transit mobile Wi-Fi & the public sector case study How Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority successfully implemented Wi-Fi on its light rail and bus lines

More white papers


 
DIGITAL EDITION

The full contents of Metro Magazine on your computer! The digital edition is an exact replica of the print magazine with enhanced search, multimedia and hyperlink features. View the current issue