December 18, 2013

Canceling Cincinnati streetcar costs less than completion, audit shows

Streetcar rendering via

Streetcar rendering via
CINCINNATI — WCPO reported that an independent audit shows it would cost the City of Cincinnati less to cancel the streetcar project than to complete it.

It would cost between $50.3 million and $80.1 million to cancel the project, while by comparison, it would cost between $104.6 million and $105.7 million to complete it, according to the audit.

The results likely will bolster the effort to cancel the project, which is advocated by Mayor John Cranley and some City Council members, according to the report. For the full story, click here. digg it stumble upon newsvine
[ Request More Info about this product / service / company ]

  • LJ Moritz[ December 18th, 2013 @ 11:48am ]

    The headline and opening paragraphs of this story show a serious lack of critical thinking and poor word choices. Of course canceling a program costs less than building a program. However the report showed that finishing the program i.e. the cost in addition to sunk costs are LESS than cancelling the program. Why isn't the writer including the sunk costs into the calculation to cancel the program? If $34 million is already spent you can't get that back and it is a cost whether the program goes forward or is cancelled. Further the questions should not be whether one would cost more or less than the other, the question should be whether or not the cost is worth what the citizens of Cincinnati will get from having a light rail system -- both from a transportation and economic development perspective. Examples all over the country would tend to support the conclusion that a study cited in the article suggests that the economic development activity spurred by light rail is significant.


Receive the latest Metro E-Newsletters in your inbox!

Join the Metro E-Newsletters and receive the latest news in your e-mail inbox once a week. SIGN UP NOW!

View the latest eNews
Express Tuesday | Express Thursday | University Transit

White Papers

Factors in Transit Bus Ramp Slope and Wheelchair-Seated Passenger Safety Nearly 3 million U.S. adults are wheelchair or scooter users1, and as the population ages this number is expected to rise. Many wheelchair users rely upon public transportation to access work, medical care, school and social activities.

Mass Transit Capital Planning An overview of the world-class best practices for assessing, prioritizing, and funding capital projects to optimize resources and align with the organization’s most critical immediate and long-term goals.

The Benefits of Door-to-Door Service in ADA Complementary Paratransit Many U.S. transit agencies continue to struggle with the quality of ADA service, the costs, and the difficulties encountered in contracting the service, which is the method of choice for a significant majority of agencies. One of the most basic policy decisions an agency must make involves whether to provide door-to-door, or only curb-to-curb service.

More white papers


The full contents of Metro Magazine on your computer! The digital edition is an exact replica of the print magazine with enhanced search, multimedia and hyperlink features. View the current issue