Rail

Thinning the rail project pipeline

Posted on November 19, 2007 by Cliff Henke

For years, FTA officials have been complaining that the gap between the “pipeline” of New Start applications in development and approvals leading to a Full Funding Grant Agreement had been hopelessly outstripping projected funding for the program. Many believe that in response, the FTA made the application and approval process tougher to help ration excess demand in the program, while simultaneously elongating the process. Now rail projects and many in the industry are fighting back in the halls of ¬Congress, setting the stage for major policy changes that could come later in the decade.

Rationing by the queue?
The British economist John Maynard Keynes referred to the technique as “rationing by the queue.” Indeed, according to an APTA study, the process now often exceeds 40 months, sharply longer than the 26 months it took roughly a decade ago.

Some believe that more is at work than standing in a longer line. The additional focus on ridership and travel time savings is skewed, and the other measures that Congress ordered the FTA to examine in the last reauthorization legislation in 2005 have not been incorporated to the degree intended, critics argue.

FTA staff reply that it is far more difficult to predict a project’s impact on economic development than it is to model ridership gain, travel time savings and expected project costs. “I defy anyone to tell me how economic development is any different from impact on land use, which we always have included,” said FTA Administrator James Simpson in October at the APTA Annual Meeting in Charlotte, N.C.

True, critics reply, but it was not so in the early years of New Starts regulations and these techniques have been refined along the way. Moreover, FTA was directed to include economic development as a separate criterion, difficult or not.

Perhaps most troubling to the industry, in its final version of the regulation implementing these provisions the FTA included considerations that were not in the law or its legislative history: a category for “very small starts” for corridors with 3,000 riders per day and capital costs of less than $3 million per mile, excluding vehicles, and evaluation bonuses for inclusion of congestion pricing.

Several studies underway are expected to help measure the impact of projects on economic development. Of course, there has been strong evidence around the country that rail and bus projects do generate economic returns. For example, more than $2 billion has been estimated around Portland’s streetcar system.

The situation is near boiling in Congress as the Senate, in its version of the FY 2008 transportation appropriations bill, voted to prohibit the use of FTA funds to implement the new regulation as written; though the House version was passed earlier and was not included, the prospects for winding up in the final bill are high. However, the outcome depends on how Congress will package the appropriation bills for the President to sign, whether he will veto the package (he has already vowed to do so, but on grounds of excessive spending) and whether this provision will get stripped from final spending approved for the year.

Prospects beyond 2009
While this all plays out, the current rule will likely become final and the FTA will begin playing by those rules. Some in the industry are also threatening to bring suit against the FTA for ignoring the intent of Congress. However, most of this is not about the current rule but how the program will be governed in the next reauthorization bill.

The current law, SAFETEA-LU (Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users), is set to expire on September 30, 2009. This means that there is only one more spending legislative cycle under SAFETEA-LU before Congress needs to renew it, if the deadline is kept (if history is any judge, it won’t be). The current rule — and the severe push back — set the stage for the next act. Given the fiscal pressures and emerging recognition of how public transportation not only positively affects economic development but also the nation’s carbon footprint and energy security, the strict cost-effectiveness index calculations will have to be revised. To paraphrase Churchill, perhaps it’s the end of the beginning

View comments or post a comment on this story. (0 Comments)

More News

SEPTA trains collide, injuring 4

Crews are still working to remove the 18 cars involved, with each car weighing about 37 tons. The NTSB is on the scene and fully in charge of the investigation.

Minn. legislators attempting to move $900M from rail to roads, bridges

GOP legislators have long sought to block planning and funding for light-rail projects, saying they put metro-area priorities above rural Minnesota.

Alstom secures $105M Australian trainset contract

The contract will expand PTV’s fleet to 101 trains (606 cars) delivered from Alstom’s manufacturing facility in Ballarat since 2002.

DC Streetcar fares to remain free

The decision to hold off on charging fares was based on two reasons — District Department of Transportation feared charging even $1 per ride would scare away passengers and charging a fare would actually cost the District money.

FTA delays decision on $650M Caltrain electrification project

In a letter sent Friday, the same day a decision was due, the agency said it was deferring a ruling so the project could be considered as part of President Donald Trump’s budget. No timeline was given in the letter.

See More News

Post a Comment

Post Comment

Comments (0)

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment

TruckingInfo.com

THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK INDUSTRY’S MOST IN-DEPTH INFORMATION SOURCE

Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

LCT Magazine

Global Resource For Limousine and Bus Transportation

Please sign in or register to .    Close