Technology

Research examines discrimination, travel patterns for Lyft, Uber, taxis

Posted on July 6, 2018

ITS doctoral student Anne E. Brown conducted a first-of-its-kind analysis of ridehail travel patterns, equity, and rider discrimination. Photo: Lyft
ITS doctoral student Anne E. Brown conducted a first-of-its-kind analysis of ridehail travel patterns, equity, and rider discrimination. Photo: Lyft

Ridehail services such as Uber and Lyft have revolutionized how people access cars. But research into where they travel and who they serve has been limited.

For the past three years, ITS doctoral student Anne E. Brown worked to fill that gap in research by conducting a first-of-its-kind analysis of ridehail travel patterns, equity, and rider discrimination.

Dr. Brown is the first scholar in the nation to access Lyft’s trip-level data — data that is not available to policymakers or the public — and analyzed rider travel and use patterns from more than 6.3 million trips taken in LA in 2016. She also conducted LA’s first audit study of Lyft, Uber, and taxi services, based on more than 1,700 rides, to measure how wait times and ride request cancellations varied across races, ethnicities, and genders.

Her main findings include:

Discrimination in the taxi industry results in higher cancellation rates and longer wait times for black riders. While taxi service overall was remarkably poor — 10 percent of taxis did not arrive within one hour — it was worst for black riders. Black riders were 73% more likely to have a driver cancel on them compared to white riders, and taxi cancellations caused  one in four black riders to never reach their destination. Black riders also waited 52% longer for their taxi to arrive, or between 6 and 15 minutes, than white riders.

By contrast, Lyft and Uber nearly eliminate the racial differences in service. On both services, a black rider had about a 4% higher likelihood of being cancelled than a white rider. But 99.7% of Lyft and Uber riders reached their destination even if one driver cancelled a trip. While unlawful discrimination from taxi drivers prevent many black riders from completing a trip, driver biases on Uber and Lyft result in delayed, but not denied, mobility. And policy changes for ridehail apps — such as tracking driver cancellation behavior, permitting riders to use pseudonyms, and changing at what point in the pickup process drivers learn a rider’s name or race — could help erase the racial gap almost entirely.

Lyft is essentially omnipresent across LA, and most riders use the service only occasionally. The Lyft travel data showed no evidence that any Los Angeles neighborhoods are excluded from service based on the characteristics of their residents. Indeed, during the study period Lyft reached neighborhoods occupied by 99.8% of LA County’s population. For most users, ridehailing fills an occasional rather than regular travel need, and a small share of users make the majority of trips. While 40% of users made less than one trip per month, another 10% of users completed more than half of all Lyft trips to, from, or within the county.

Dr. Brown’s findings have clear policy implications for both the private operators of ridehail companies...

Lyft may improve auto-mobility for residents of lower-income neighborhoods. There was a strong association between Lyft use and lower rates of vehicle ownership in a neighborhood. The shared, more affordable Lyft Line service made up 29% of all Lyft trips in LA County, with people living in low-income neighborhoods comprising a higher share of Lyft Line rides. But Lyft use was lower than average in majority Asian and Hispanic neighborhoods, suggesting either that car access is already being met through carpooling or informal services, or that barriers such as lower smartphone, data plan, or banking access inhibit ridehail use.

Dr. Brown’s findings have clear policy implications for both the private operators of ridehail companies, who can take steps to further reduce discrimination against riders, and public officials, who must determine how to integrate ridehailing into mobility planning and better regulate discriminatory practices in the taxi industry.

View comments or post a comment on this story. (1 Comment)

More News

Uber terminates 100 self-driving car operators in Pittsburgh

The company plans to replace the jobs with about 55 “mission specialists,” who are trained in both on-road and more advanced test-track operations

Seon adds 8-channel hybrid HD system to TH series surveillance line-up

The high-definition surveillance solution provides full coverage inside and outside the vehicle to promote passenger safety and reduce liability.

Alstom's hydrogen fuel-cell train approved for German commercial ops

Two Coradia iLint prototypes will enter pilot operation in the Elbe-Weser network, with passenger service scheduled for late summer.

BYD partners to launch first-ever electric bus leasing program

The program will help public and private sector clients accelerate adoption of battery-powered electric buses by reducing upfront costs.

TARTA to test autonomous bus technology

Exploring autonomous vehicles is a component in TARTA’s recently introduced strategic vision.

See More News

Post a Comment

Post Comment

Comments (1)

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment

TruckingInfo.com

THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK INDUSTRY’S MOST IN-DEPTH INFORMATION SOURCE

Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

LCT Magazine

Global Resource For Limousine and Bus Transportation

Please sign in or register to .    Close