LOS ANGELES — During a meeting, California High-Speed Rail Authority directors pushed back against a UC Berkeley-based Institute of Transportation Studies academic analysis challenging the reliability of ridership and revenue estimates underpinning the 800-mile project, according to the Los Angeles Times. The Institute's report said that patronage models for the $42-billion first phase were too flawed to accurately predict whether the trains would run severe deficits or generate large operating surpluses, as planners predict. For the full story, click here.

 

 

About the author
Staff Writer

Staff Writer

Editorial

Our team of enterprising editors brings years of experience covering the fleet industry. We offer a deep understanding of trends and the ever-evolving landscapes we cover in fleet, trucking, and transportation.  

View Bio
0 Comments