When official-plated transit authority vehicles were scarce and basically reserved for those in upper management to go about their daily business to and from meetings, etc..., road control would be the responsibility of the “fixed-post foot dispatcher.” Not all of these positions have been eliminated, but I wonder if any readers remember the stability and sense of control that was present while the foot dispatcher was on post?
The fixed-post foot dispatchers/supervisors had varying assignments that changed their basic responsibilities, but their main responsibility was managing the operators that were assigned to their route(s). I say “their” route(s) because the operators that they managed were in a sense working for that foot dispatcher. The foot dispatchers being considered as the coach, considered the operators working those routes as the players they coached. It became personal to them. The manner in which the operator performed their jobs would reflect in the foot dispatcher themselves.
On the first day of a new “pick” (schedule implementation), I thought it was a great time to personally introduce myself to all operators that would be on the routes I was responsible for and conduct a respectful brief conversation informing the operators what I would and would not tolerate. One of the best means of asserting control of the road is to inform all bus operators that they must not bypass a bus stop where any member of supervision is present. I also informed each of them that I would not hide, but be visible, so they could depend on me to be there for them whenever they were in need of a service adjustment or for assistance. The way fixed-post foot dispatchers performed their jobs had a direct impact on the quality of service that a customer received.
Simply recording bus numbers on a tally sheet was not all that was required by the foot dispatcher. The primary responsibility was meeting service needs by monitoring and maintaining even headways and by the implementation of service restoration techniques. This would gradually reduce excessive gaps in service and return service back to their normal scheduled headways as quickly as possible. Fixed-post foot dispatchers also:
- Played a role in maintaining good customer relations by their anticipated presence on their post.
- Kept the mobile route manager informed of activity on their routes.
- Provided a daily written report of service-related observations and activities.
- Remained visible on post to provide any requested assistance to their operators.
- Ensured that road reliefs are made and to make relief adjustments when necessary.
- Checked arriving operators for proper uniform compliance.
- Observed each arriving operators condition and ability to safely operate their bus.
Many foot dispatcher posts have been eliminated and replaced by mobile supervision. This is needed as they cover more ground in a shorter amount of time than the foot dispatchers who may have had to abandon their post to respond to a call on foot or using mass transportation. The negative part of the removal of so many foot dispatchers is the absence of their eyes and ears that they provided while on post. Their mere presence kept everyone honest and assured that the service provided was delivered in a smooth and regulated manner. Holding operators to their schedule departure time eliminated the need to go from terminal to terminal as quickly as possible, which usually resulted in speed being an issue.
Today, I’m afraid that in some cases with outdated schedules not providing sufficient running times for operators (being a Schedule Department issue), operators are forced to increase their speed in an attempt to maintain the schedule. If this is the case, this increase in speed dangerously repositions the 3 S’s of transportation from Safety, Service & Schedule to Schedule, Service & Safety. Schedule should never overshadow Safety at the top of the pyramid.
Today, with no or minimal fixed-post foot dispatchers to make the necessary adjustments and to slow things down where applicable, which I believe can reduce some of the collisions that occur with a route that is void of fixed-post road dispatchers, it might be time to reinstate them back to their street posts.
Is something as simple as reinstating the fixed-post foot dispatcher being overlooked as a possible deterrent to some of our knockdowns and collisions that unfortunately occur? I say bring back the fixed-post foot dispatcher.
Louie Maiello is a sr. consultant (transit training & simulation), L-3/DPA; independent consultant, Bus Talk Surface transit Solutions; and writes a monthly blog for metro-magazine.com.
Diagnose, Prescribe & Follow-Up, are the usual doctor’s actions that are utilized when visiting the doctor’s office for whatever is ailing us. This formula should also apply within your training department with regard to the ailment of Bus Collisions.
If we encourage our operators to treat operating a bus as a shift-long Zen moment, we may be able to reduce preventable crashes by a significant amount. The “Zen Operator,” who drives precisely at all times, is also less stressed. The Zen Operator flows through difficult, tight situations easily and their body language and vibe give passengers a sense of confidence. The operator whose passengers have a white-knuckle death grip on the back of the seat in front of them is not practicing “Zen Bus Operation.”
Ah, summer. Pool parties, barbecues, the smell of honeysuckle and the sight of lightning bugs. Or — a rise in crime, agitated riders seeking air conditioning, heat stroke, a new fiscal year, and the necessary, but unpopular, fare increases. However you view the summer months, with a direct correlation between high temperatures and increased crime, it's vital for transit leaders to be asking themselves, "Have we done everything possible to keep our people safe?"
The RMS occurred last month in Albany, N.Y. and it was a truly remarkable learning experience for those in attendance. The RMS serves as a one-of-a-kind event that brings together transit risk management professionals from all across the country to focus on key topics related to safety, risk management, planning and prevention.
I recently attended, and had the opportunity to be part of a panel of speakers, at the NYC MTA Bus Safety Symposium. A variety of topics were discussed regarding bus and pedestrian safety issues. What was obvious is we all have a common goal to provide the safest transit systems possible, in spite of the possibility of increasing bus/pedestrian and bus/cyclist collisions.