This month, in our continuing coverage of bus operator training tips, we will cover the topic of safety blitzes.
What exactly is a safety blitz?
Think of a safety blitz as seeking confirmation that bus operators are in compliance, or non-compliant, with your standard operating procedures during an unannounced "spot check" of a specific skill set. A blitz may also be initiated in response to a sudden spike in unsafe actions being reported, observed or indicated by video review.
Why a safety blitz?
The goal is to gain an accurate account of what’s going on in your system.
There are several reasons you might want to consider initiating a “blitz.” Let's take a quick look:
- Customer complaints regarding operator’s use of cell phone while operating their bus.
- Operators have been observed using one hand to steer the bus.
- Operators failing to utilize their directional signals when entering a bus stop.
- Operators accelerating to cross intersection during yellow and red signal conditions.
- To establish that an "unannounced randomly selected" blitz can occur at any given time.
- To ensure that any unsafe act will not go unnoticed by management.
- To acknowledge and recognize those operators that continue to demonstrate safe consistent operation of their bus on a daily basis.
How can a safety blitz be implemented?
- Select the skill set to be observed for compliance.
- Identify the locations to position personnel to gather your information.
- Set a start and finish time.
- Agree on what verbal corrective action/remedy will be utilized for operators found to be non-compliant.
- Schedule a follow up blitz
- Provide incentives for compliant operators
When should it be conducted?
- Randomly, to see whether compliance is the standard operating procedure.
- During the probationary period of an operator in addition to onboard observation rides.
- After a spike in a particular collision or complaint.
Who will conduct the blitz?
- Supervisory-level personnel, preferably training department personnel.
- In cases where training dept. personnel and safety dept. personnel are on the same page with standard operating procedures — and this should always be the case — it can be a joint training and safety effort.
RELATED: How to know when your trainees are ready to roll
I mentioned incentives for those operators found to be compliant during the "safety blitz." I knew of an agency that would provide patches, pens, lapel pins, hats, etc., to those individuals that were observed doing their jobs to the agency’s standards.
It would work like this: let’s say the blitz focused on the proper use of directionals entering a bus stop. An operator that was observed to be compliant in this particular skill would first be approached by the person conducting the blitz and made aware of his/her good actions. The operator would be given a ticket stub to turn in to supervision at the end of their tour. Upon turning in the stub they would be given the predetermined item selected as a reward during that particular blitz.
This is easy to implement, you can be creative as you want and most importantly unsafe behavior is quickly identified and can be dealt with in a constructive manner that will protect the operator, the agency and your loyal customers.
Louie is the former director of training for the New York City Transit Dept. of Buses Safety & Training Division and 2003 NTI Fellow. Currently, he is sr. consultant/SME in transit training & bus simulation at L-3 D.P. Associates and independent consultant at "Bus Talk" Surface Transit Solutions.
In case you missed it...
Read our previous blog, "How to Maximize Peak Performance from Your New Transit Maintenance Facility"
Nowadays, there’s an app for everything. Very few of those apps can turn an everyday transit rider into a hero who summons help for a person in distress. A routine ride on your transit system can be suddenly disrupted if you witness an assault, a crime in progress or a medical emergency. That is why apps designed for public safety must take all imaginable scenarios into consideration.
As we all have experienced, chatter regarding topics other than performance-based basic skill development, such as current events, sports or one’s families, will develop onboard and can break the tension that candidates are experiencing in attempting to do their best. This tension breaker may do good for them, but this should occur during non-development drive time.
Thinking of the situation in terms of “who should yield” will lead operators to a less aggressive mindset. Once we get our operators to think in terms of “who should yield,” the logical follow up question to ask is “will they yield?” Once operators start looking at situations with a “yield” attitude, it becomes easier to recognize situations, which may result in preventable crashes.
Dr. Donald Kirkpatrick long ago defined four levels of evaluation to determine the effectiveness of any training program. It is common for the bulk of effort being put forth by any training department to focus on Level 1 and Level 2. This typically manifests as the time we spend planning for and executing the prescribed training activities that form our learning programs. Many organizations are now finding that they have the most potential for achieving performance improvements by focusing more energy and resources toward Level 3 activities, such as coaching.
When official-plated transit authority vehicles were scarce and basically reserved for those in upper management to go about their daily business to and from meetings, etc..., road control would be the responsibility of the “fixed-post foot dispatcher.” Not all of these positions have been eliminated, but I wonder if any readers remember the stability and sense of control that was present while the foot dispatcher was on post?