Lyft and Uber Can Save Transit — if Transit Gets on Board

Posted on March 22, 2018 by Daniel Sperling, Ph.D. - Also by this author

Transit ridership declined in 34 of the 40 largest metropolitan areas over the past three years. Photo: NY MTA/Patrick Cashin
Transit ridership declined in 34 of the 40 largest metropolitan areas over the past three years. Photo: NY MTA/Patrick Cashin

This post is co-authored by Daniel Sperling and Steven Polzin

Bad news for transit keeps rolling in. Transit ridership declined in 34 of the 40 largest metropolitan areas over the past three years. New York’s subway woes continue, Washington Metro struggles with funding and maintenance, and even In Los Angeles, with its massive rail system buildout supported by $120 billion in tax increases over 40 years, ridership is declining. Explanations for declining ridership include low gasoline prices, economic growth, increasing car ownership, immigrants’ fear of using transit, homeless loitering, and safety and security concerns. 

While ridership routinely fluctuates in response to economic upturns and downturns and other trends, this decline seems more profound. Increased communication (e-commerce, telecommuting, distance learning) and new technologies and business models (bikeshare, carshare, app-based ride-hailing) suggest a more pronounced challenge for public transportation. This decline seems likely to accelerate once vehicle automation takes hold. More automation means the cost of mobility services by private companies — not just Uber, Lyft, and Via, but likely GM, Ford, and many others — will fall. Can public transit survive?

Transit must be integrated, or at least coordinated, with other expanding mobility services.

Yes — but an entirely fresh approach is needed. Ridesharing services like Uber and Lyft have the potential to be a boon to transit, but only if we reimagine transit as mobility. To encourage ridership, the silos between transit, taxis, on-demand app-based services, and bikesharing need to be removed. Transit must be integrated, or at least coordinated, with other expanding mobility services.
What would such a hybrid system look like? It would include traditional trunk line transit for major corridors where limited curb space and large passenger flows favor larger vehicles.

These high-volume services would be supplemented with on-demand automated ridesharing in suburbs and small cities — subsidized for low-income riders and perhaps those making connections to transit hubs. These other services would also provide first/last mile access to rail and major bus routes, feeding the efficient trunk lines. It means a single integrated app for information and payments. A public entity such as the transit operator would play a major role in oversight and governance, ensuring safety, equity and integration of services. Mechanisms would be needed to assure low-income riders are served. The mix of vehicle types and technologies, and the party(ies) responsible for ownership and operation could vary from one area to another.  

In this new transportation world, traditional transit would need to refocus on what it is good at — serving dense traffic corridors and dense cities. It would remain the most economically efficient means of moving large numbers of travelers, but it needs to reimagine strategies for less dense suburban areas where its current costs and service are far inferior to those of new private on-demand services.

In this new transportation world, traditional transit would need to refocus on what it is good at — serving dense traffic corridors and dense cities.

This refashioning of mobility is radical in many ways. It requires public funding — which now subsidizes 80% of all transit costs — to be restructured. It may involve extracting resources from those users and land owners that most benefit, charging full costs in some cases, providing subsidies directly to low-income travelers regardless whether the service is provided by government or business. Or in places where transit use is high, it may be priced low and subsidized through progressive general revenue sources. It will require collaboration and cooperation between public and private companies. If transit integrates effectively with services like Uber and Lyft, the result could be an increase in public transportation from current 2-3% of trips to 20 to 30%, or more. And, it would generate new jobs — many of them high quality — to manage and staff these new mobility service companies.

This is the future. Today’s transit operators can be part of the solution, or they can wither under the onslaught of technology and competition.

Dr. Daniel Sperling is the author of Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future (Island Press, February 2018)   and founding director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis.

Steven Polzin, Ph.D., is the Program Director for Mobility Policy Research at the Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida.


Links:
http://islandpress.org/book/three-revolutions
https://www.its.ucla.edu/2018/01/31/new-report-its-scholars-on-the-cause-of-californias-falling-transit-ridership/
 “Just Around the Corner: The Future of U.S. Public Transportation”, Journal of Public Transportation, 21 (1): 43-52. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol21/iss1/5/, February 2018.

 

View comments or post a comment on this story. (7 Comments)

More Transit Dispatches Blog Posts

April 17, 2018

Transit Facility Center Gives Help, Hope to Those 'With Nowhere to Go'

Transit facilities — train stations, bus depots and transportation centers — are often the shelter of choice for people experiencing homelessness, especially when weather conditions make it too dangerous to stay outside.

April 11, 2018

Mass Transit Must Integrate Data, Tech to Be Part of Mobility Landscape

Startups and legacy industries are harnessing big data to transform and revolutionize the ways their services are offered. Among the sectors sitting on the richest mines of data is public transportation, with municipalities and service providers boasting decades of data on urban transportation and mobility.

March 27, 2018

Public Transit Needs a Voice in Automated/Autonomous Vehicle Regulatory Talks

This technology will forever change transportation on a local level and national scale; the time is ripe for public transit agencies and OEMs to be more visible in shaping the outcome of these discussions, regulations, and laws.

March 7, 2018

Railway cybersecurity must never be taken lightly

Many cybersecurity breaches are traced back to human error, from lack of compliance with security policies to configuration errors. Even the best-trained staff can be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of daily alerts that need to be tackled.

February 28, 2018

How to Host a 'Super' Travel Day on Transit for Fans

As one of the biggest cities in the country, Philadelphia is often selected to host events that attract national and international audiences, most recently the 2013 U.S. Open Championship, the 2015 World Meeting of Families and papal visit by Pope Francis, the 2016 Democratic National Convention, and the 2017 NFL Draft. But until February 7, 2018, the city had never hosted a Super Bowl champions parade.

See More

Post a Comment

Post Comment

Comments (7)

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment

TruckingInfo.com

THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK INDUSTRY’S MOST IN-DEPTH INFORMATION SOURCE

Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

LCT Magazine

Global Resource For Limousine and Bus Transportation

Please sign in or register to .    Close