Management & Operations

10 milestones in public-private partnerships

Posted on January 1, 2004 by Cliff Henke

The history of public transportation is the story of government intervention, directly and indirectly. In fact, public-private tension in public transportation is among the more fascinating episodes of the relationship between government and industry in our country’s history. Below are 10 of the most interesting points in that journey. 1. Electrification. After electricity was invented, governments began to grant easements and charters to electric railways and, later, trolleybuses. Government was both enabler and regulator, granting exclusive franchises and, at worst, stipulating in some cities only where companies string their wires. 2. New York City’s subways. In the 1890s, New York’s Rapid Transit Commission recommended that the city award a franchise for its first subway lines, responding to the public’s demand for something more reliable and quieter than elevated systems. The result, known as the Interborough Rapid Transit, was a new kind of public-private partnership, an American answer to earlier European experiments in suburban and underground rail. 3. Federal Electric Railway Commission. In response to an industry crisis caused by intense competition both within the streetcar industry as well as from motor buses and jitneys, President Woodrow Wilson created a commission to recommend solutions. Its 1920 report urged a more active public role, but the solutions were considered too radical. 4. The interurban railways. During the first three decades of the 20th century, communities would often cut deals with developers and electric railway companies. These policies were often responsible for the early sprawl in such places as Los Angeles and Indianapolis. 5. Motorbus era. The internal combustion engine contributed its own answer to problems associated with horse-drawn vehicles, and their inherent flexibility over electric and rail-based modes lowered the competitive barriers in public transit. Congestion and threats to safety prompted most cities to begin regulating these operators — and prompted the first charges of “unfair favoritism to rail” leveled at governments by bus companies. 6. Federal Aid to Highways Act. In the 1920s, the auto industry received the first of its decades-long string of massive federal subsidies, helping to put interurban rail networks out of business. 7. Utility divestitures. In the 1930s, President Franklin Roosevelt forced electric utilities to divest their tram companies. The utilities’ ability to cross-subsidize their streetcar subsidiaries with cheap or free traction power, coupled with public subsidies of auto travel, effectively wrote the death warrant for privately owned and operated rail transit. 8. Urban Mass Transportation Act. In 1964, Congress acted to help cities bail out failing transit companies, providing the framework for the industry as we know it today. Section 13(c) of the act also created the labor protections that have helped the industry to be one of the nation’s most heavily unionized. Other provisions of the law, which were supposed to help preserve private competition, have been less effective. 9. Americans With Disabilities Act. The 1991 landmark civil rights law extended the guarantees of a bus ride with a wheelchair lift contained in earlier regulations much further. ADA’s estimated billion-dollar price tag has prompted many transit agencies to outsource their mandated paratransit service. The result is that more than 12% of all U.S. transit operating costs are for purchased service, roughly three times the early 1980s’ share. 10. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Enacted in 1998, TEA 21 was an unprecedented federal commitment to public-private partnerships. Its far-reaching provisions range from federal assistance to motorcoach companies, ostensibly to pay for their costs of ADA compliance, to incentives for greater private investment in public transportation. TEA 21Õs legacy is only beginning to be felt.

View comments or post a comment on this story. (0 Comments)

More News

Technology, shifts in behavior can improve urban transportation: report

Respondents around the globe chose "driving their own car" over other modes of transport for reasons including comfort (54%), ease of access (47%), and reliability (39%).

Phoenix names new bus rapid transit administrator

Mike James spent the last four-and-a-half years planning and managing rail and transit corridors in Seattle, which included street car operations and seven new BRT corridors.

Deadline extended for Innovative Solutions Award submissions

Applications can be submitted either by the operation or the solutions provider and will be judged by our BusCon Advisory Board, with winners and shortlisted submissions recognized at BusCon’s Award Breakfast on Wednesday, Sept. 13.

Calif.'s GCTD breaks ground on ops, maintenance facility

The new facility will replace an outdated and deteriorating bus garage located on a three-acre site that was originally built in the 1970’s for a much smaller fleet.

London most expensive city to commute to work via public transit

New York City comes in it at No. 4 at a cost of approximately $120 per month, with Chicago and San Francisco at $102.10 and $86.10 per month, respectively.

See More News

Post a Comment

Post Comment

Comments (0)

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment

TruckingInfo.com

THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK INDUSTRY’S MOST IN-DEPTH INFORMATION SOURCE

Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

LCT Magazine

Global Resource For Limousine and Bus Transportation

Please sign in or register to .    Close