New Mineta Study Explores Comprehensive Metrics for Fair Transit Services in California
By researching federal laws and regulations related to Title IV, MPO planning and policy documents, and academic papers related to equity measurement, the research team evaluated extant information on current equity measurement

The Mineta study applies a series of possible metrics to a test case in Santa Cruz County, Calif., with Santa Cruz County Metropolitan Transit District and compares results to those generated by Title VI metric requirements.
Proterra
A new report from Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI), “Defining and Measuring Equity in Public Transportation,” aids Caltrans and other transit agencies in assessing transit service equity and helps evaluate potential solutions for past, existing, and future inequities.
Title VI is the federal policy that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity that receives federal funds.
The Study
By researching federal laws and regulations related to Title IV, metropolitan planning organization (MPO) planning and policy documents, and academic papers related to equity measurement, the research team evaluated extant information on current equity measurement. From this information, the study applies a series of possible metrics to a test case in Santa Cruz County, Calif., with Santa Cruz County Metropolitan Transit District and compares results to those generated by Title VI metric requirements.
A review of the literature and transit practices found that Federal Transit Administration Title VI requirements have significant shortcomings for measuring transit equity. These are:
They only look at race and income.
They only address planned service change inequities and not existing inequities.
They do not set standards for defining and measuring equity.
“Current Title VI title requirements fall short in several regards in addressing the needs of transportation-disadvantaged persons. They only address how different race and income groups would be affected by proposed transit fare and service changes and do not address remedying existing inequities, nor do they consider other characteristics of transportation-disadvantaged populations,” explain the study’s authors. “There are several other measures that could reasonably be considered as indicators of transportation-disadvantaged populations. They include low vehicle ownership, households without internet access, single-parent households headed by females with children, and persons who work at night where little or no transit service is running at that time.”
Room for Improvement
The extensive research and analyses found that current standard practice metrics (race and income) likely miss critical aspects of equity. Agencies can employ new techniques and measurements that capture overlooked metrics, especially those that correlate to traditionally underserved populations who may not have access to the transit services they require. Identifying and diagnosing inequities in transit service provision are key.
Traditional ways to seek public input, particularly public hearings, are typically least accessible to groups such as those with low incomes and other historically marginalized groups. Taking these seemingly small actions can make huge improvements in transportation equity for all, according to the study.
More New Mobility

6 Transit Management Lessons for Colleges and Universities Facing Seasonal Demand Swings
College transportation demand swings wildly throughout the year. Fleet strategies are starting to catch up.
Read More →METROspectives: CharterUP CEO Armir Harris on Modernizing Mobility
From digital transformation to evolving customer demands, CharterUP's CEO Armir Harris offers his perspective on the transportation industry's next chapter.
Read More →
Joshua Schank on Transportation Innovation, Risk, and the Future of Mobility
In this edition of METROspectives, Joshua Schank discusses lessons from launching LA Metro’s Office of Extraordinary Innovation, the challenges of advancing new mobility technologies, and much more.
Read More →Low-Floor vs. High-Floor Cutaway vs. Modified Van: How 3 Accessible Minibus Designs Compare
As transit demands evolve, so should your fleet. Download the whitepaper to see how the Low-Floor Frontrunner Minibus compares to traditional options.
Read More →Joshua Schank on Transportation Innovation, Risk, and the Future of Mobility
In this edition of METROspectives, the co-author of New Tricks for Old Bureaucracies, discusses lessons from launching LA Metro’s Office of Extraordinary Innovation, the challenges of advancing new mobility technologies, and much more.
Read More →
Biz Briefs: Foothill Gold Line Award, Matawan Contract, and More
From strategic partnerships to acquisitions and service expansions, the industry continues to evolve at a rapid pace. Find out all the latest here.
Read More →
Inside Look: EMBARK Expands Fare-Free Transit Program Through New Public-Private Partnership
The OKC transit agency says sponsorship helps subsidize the Third Friday Free initiative while reducing barriers for first-time riders and boosting ridership across buses, streetcars, and river cruises.
Read More →2026 METRO Buyer’s Guide & Directory
Searching for the right vehicles, technology, equipment, or services for your public transit or motorcoach operation? This industry guide brings together manufacturers and suppliers from across the transportation market — all in one place. Download it to connect with the companies that help agencies and operators improve mobility, enhance operations, and move their organizations forward.
Read More →
King County Test Heliox Chargers, Keolis Lands California Contract Top Biz Briefs
Stay informed with these quick takes on the projects and companies driving progress across the transportation landscape.
Read More →
Via Announces Scheduling and Supply Studio
The Scheduling and Supply Studio provides the world’s first fully integrated platform for optimizing vehicle and driver availability to rider demand, said company officials.
Read More →