Consultant Q&A: AECOM's Diane Cowin on Planning, Innovation, and the Future of Transit
As Transit Market Leader for the Americas, she brings deep expertise in federal funding strategy, ESG-focused development, and equity-centered leadership.
Diane Cowin is committed to advancing sustainable, resilient transportation and energy solutions across the Americas.
Photo: AECOM
4 min to read
Diane Cowin is AECOM's Transit Market Leader for the Americas. With deep expertise in federal transit funding, regulatory strategy, and ESG-driven market development, she is a trusted advisor to public and private sector clients.
Cowin brings a proven track record in profit and loss leadership, operational excellence, and equity-centered succession planning. In addition to her executive roles, she is an inclusive and creative board director with experience across nonprofit and corporate boards. She is committed to advancing sustainable, resilient transportation and energy solutions across the Americas.
Ad Loading...
METRO spoke to Cowin about the challenges transit projects face during the planning phase and efficiency, accessibility, and other aspects of project execution.
Transit Project Hurdles and Execution
What are the biggest challenges you face during the planning phase of a transit project?
I started my transit career as a planner, so I don’t see challenges as much as a project's possibilities and potential at the initiation phase. Complex infrastructure planning is a dynamic and nuanced balance of getting an appropriately positioned champion, maintaining public and stakeholder interest and confidence, and defining the project that betters the community it serves within a budget and schedule that leverages funding and financing from public and private sources.
Due to supply chain complexities, lengthy approvals, mid-design scope modifications, increased demand for talent, and other macro and micro-economic realities, transit project capital costs have risen significantly. This has resulted in a rise in cost-saving innovations, a focus on sustained support through continuous communication, complex compromise and informed consent, and a strategic approach to phasing and/or the financial stack for the project.
What innovative design or engineering solutions have you implemented to enhance transit efficiency?
Increasing capital costs and competition for funding and financing drive innovation to deliver efficiencies in all phases of a project or program, including an increase in design automation with AI and the concept of design to cost.
During transit project development, AECOM focuses on cost-driven approaches such as ‘design to cost,’ which drives prudent decision-making and management on scope. This approach can also establish ‘minimal viable products’ to meet the budget and provide much-needed transit services in a phased approach. Computational design with AI for repeatable elements like bridges saves design time and supports efficient decision-making while learning and improving with each new task.
Ad Loading...
These cost and funding circumstances are also driving innovative and alternative approaches to derive additional capacity improvements in existing infrastructure operations with headway reductions through advanced digital technology for train signaling systems.
How do you ensure that transit projects are designed with equity and accessibility in mind?
Early on, a significant shift in my career came about after I had worked on my first light rail (LRT) project for DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit). I saw how the opportunities for community building and access to new jobs, healthcare, and affordable homes could redefine people’s lives.
However, to deliver a truly equitable and accessible service, a focused intention is required during every phase of a project. Providing meaningful opportunities for representation early and often during project definition and design is an essential first step; however, developing key performance indicators with the communities and representative groups holds agencies and project teams accountable.
To deliver a truly equitable and accessible service, a focused intention is required during every phase of a project, Cowin says.
Photo: DART
The Future of Public Transportation
What does the future of public transit look like in 10 to 20 years?
The transit industry is primed to evolve in the next 10 to 20 years. I see the continued emergence of AI and automation in project development, improving operations, and customer service. Further development and enhancement of technology for customer information systems, ticketing, and payment systems will likely enhance passenger experience and confidence.
The energy transition and renewables will continue to trend with advancements and innovations in everything from energy storage and management solutions to new renewable profiles coming to market for transit rolling stock and vehicles.
Ad Loading...
Vehicle technologies are evolving rapidly through automation, AI, and energy systems, which will allow more flexibility for the customer but also challenge the transit industry to remain flexible and adaptable to take advantage of the changing landscape at a rapid pace.
METRO’s People Movement highlights the latest leadership changes, promotions, and personnel news across the public transit, motorcoach, and people mobility sectors.
BART began offering select parking lots to non-BART riders to generate new revenue to help address its FY27 $376M operating budget deficit brought on by remote work.
Drawing on decades of industry experience, Evans-Benson offered insights into the differences between the two, along with tips for better customer engagement and more.
The renewals include continued operations at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida; the PRTC in Virginia; and RTC Washoe in Nevada.
The governor’s proposed auto insurance reforms could save the agency $48 million annually by limiting payouts in crashes where buses are not primarily at fault.
What truly drives the cost of a paratransit fleet? Beyond the purchase price, seven operational factors quietly determine maintenance frequency, downtime, and long-term service reliability. This whitepaper explores how these factors shape lifecycle cost and what agencies should evaluate when selecting paratransit vehicles.
In this conversation, TBC’s Executive Director Ed Redfern, President Corey Aldridge, and Washington Representative Joel Rubin outline the coalition’s key policy priorities, the challenges facing transit agencies, and how industry stakeholders can work together to strengthen the voice of bus transit at the federal level.
Amanda Wanke, who has worked at DART for 10 years, including the past 2½ years as CEO, will join Metro Transit as deputy chief operating officer, operations administration.