Starting in 2005, optimism ran high that expansions to the intercity bus and rail system would provide travelers with increasingly viable alternatives to driving, particularly on short- and middle-distance routes.
Lexcie
3 min to read
Starting in 2005, optimism ran high that expansions to the intercity bus and rail system would provide travelers with increasingly viable alternatives to driving, particularly on short- and middle-distance routes.
Lexcie
Declining gas prices and fewer public transportation options are forcing travelers back behind the wheel, according to a new study by DePaul University’s Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development.
“Low fuel prices have a serious downside,” said Joseph Schwieterman, professor in the School of Public Service and director of the institute. “When more people choose to drive, there can be a snowball effect that limits the public transportation options available to others, who then feel compelled to drive as well.” The study is co-authored by C. Scott Smith, assistant director of the institute; and graduate student Riley O’Neil.
Ad Loading...
Researchers found:
Lower fuel prices and heightened competition from airlines have weakened demand for Amtrak and express coach bus lines. Despite a recent uptick, new service offerings have lagged and not kept pace with the country’s rising population.
Gaps in ground transportation have emerged, making efforts to avoid driving on some popular routes more difficult than just a few years ago. These gaps are due to both slowed investment in new routes, as well as cutbacks by express coach lines outside of the busy Northeast region.
Numerous metropolitan areas remain largely inaccessible to travelers who seek to avoid flying or driving but are unwilling to use conventional bus lines such as Greyhound. These “Pockets of Pain” include Phoenix; Columbus, Ohio; Dayton, Ohio; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Ft. Myers, Fla.; and Sarasota, Fla.
Some short- and mid-distance routes with more than one million trips a year have no service by Amtrak or express coach lines, including Los Angeles to Phoenix; Cleveland to Detroit; Chicago to Columbus; Las Vegas to Phoenix; and Ft. Myers to Tampa.
Since 2015, Express coach lines began trimming frequency on some routes and ended service to other cities altogether.
Greyhound
Researchers at DePaul have been following the ebb and flow of bus and rail travel in the U.S. for more than a decade. Starting in 2005, optimism ran high that expansions to the intercity bus and rail system would provide travelers with increasingly viable alternatives to driving, particularly on short- and middle-distance routes, explained Schwieterman.
However by 2015, the hoped-for transformation of this intercity travel market has lost steam. Bus and train traffic had ebbed, buffeted by low fuel prices, heightened competition from airlines, and barriers to planned service improvements. The rollout of new trains slowed. Express coach lines began trimming frequency on some routes and ended service to other cities altogether.
“Everyone should take notice when momentum to improve bus and rail service diminishes, as these modes are critical to the mobility of those who cannot or prefer not to drive while also enhancing safety and fuel efficiency,” said Smith.
Drawing upon these findings, the researchers outline steps that public entities can take to give travelers more opportunities for ground-based intercity services. For example, researchers call for more effective arrangements to support states working together to improve rail corridors. They call for planners to follow the example of Boston, Denver, and Washington, D.C., by creating dedicated, centrally-located bus terminals that can help relieve overburdened curbside pickup spots. In addition, researchers cite Amtrak’s “Thruway Bus Network” program, which connects riders on buses and trains, as a model for other cities to follow. Schwieterman says California, Michigan, and Oregon have seen boosts in ridership through the program.
“There are proven ways for planners to better coordinate bus and rail services, and these success stories from around the country show that there are practical opportunities to help people lessen their dependence on driving,” said Schwieterman.
METRO’s People Movement highlights the latest leadership changes, promotions, and personnel news across the public transit, motorcoach, and people mobility sectors.
BART began offering select parking lots to non-BART riders to generate new revenue to help address its FY27 $376M operating budget deficit brought on by remote work.
Drawing on decades of industry experience, Evans-Benson offered insights into the differences between the two, along with tips for better customer engagement and more.
The renewals include continued operations at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida; the PRTC in Virginia; and RTC Washoe in Nevada.
The governor’s proposed auto insurance reforms could save the agency $48 million annually by limiting payouts in crashes where buses are not primarily at fault.
What truly drives the cost of a paratransit fleet? Beyond the purchase price, seven operational factors quietly determine maintenance frequency, downtime, and long-term service reliability. This whitepaper explores how these factors shape lifecycle cost and what agencies should evaluate when selecting paratransit vehicles.
In this conversation, TBC’s Executive Director Ed Redfern, President Corey Aldridge, and Washington Representative Joel Rubin outline the coalition’s key policy priorities, the challenges facing transit agencies, and how industry stakeholders can work together to strengthen the voice of bus transit at the federal level.
Amanda Wanke, who has worked at DART for 10 years, including the past 2½ years as CEO, will join Metro Transit as deputy chief operating officer, operations administration.
