US DOT Gives Guidance on Competitive Grants
After a directive was issued to review competitive grant programs, the U.S. Department of Transportation has issued guidance addressing questions regarding energy, climate change, diversity, and equity.

The U.S. DOT has provided guidance on its required competitive grant review, including which specific presidential policies apply and an outline of steps to take after the review.
Photo: USDOT/Canva
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) recently issued guidance regarding the directive for all modal agencies to review all competitive grant programs and awards, including a project-by-project review. These reviews include programs run by the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Railroad Administration.
Guidance on What Policies Apply
The reviews are to identify project scope and activities that allocate funding to advance priorities counter to the Trump Administration’s executive orders, including climate, energy, diversity, and equity projects.
Policies that apply to the review are outlined in Executive Order 14148, Executive Order 14154, Executive Order 14151, Executive Order 14168, secretarial Order 2100.7, and the Secretarial Memorandum on Implementation of Executive Orders Addressing Energy, Climate Change, Diversity, and Gender.
This guidance applies to competitive award selections made after January 20, 2021, without grant agreements or partially obligated grant agreements. Projects with executed grant agreements that are fully obligated are outside the scope of the provided guidance.
Identifying Components Against Current Presidential Policy
Modal agencies are to identify programs that may include any elements such as equity activities, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion activities, climate change activities, environmental justice activities, and gender-specific activities. Programs with the primary purpose of bicycle infrastructure, electric vehicles (EV), and electric vehicle charging infrastructure must also be identified.
Projects with any of the above elements will be subject to a project-by-project review if they meet specific criteria. Project-by-project reviews will examine and flag any project scope elements or activities for potential removal, such as:
Project activities such as equity analysis, green infrastructure, bicycle infrastructure, EV and/or EV charging infrastructure.
Project purpose or primary project benefits that include equity and/or climate such as projects that purposefully improve the condition for EJ communities or actively reduce GHG emissions.
Steps to Take After Elements Have Been Identified
Agencies must recommend to the Office of the Secretary which project sections should continue in their current form, be revised with a reduced or modified scope, or be canceled entirely based on their review.
Agencies will negotiate with the project sponsor to update the project scope to eliminate and replace identified project elements that align with the program statute, scope of the project sponsor’s application, and Trump Administration executive orders if a project is revised.
If the project sponsor does not agree to remove project elements, the DOT has directed agencies to proceed with a reduced award, removing the flagged scope and activities.
More News: HID Mass Transit Report Highlights 5 Key Priorities for 2025
More Management

ABAF Study Reveals Growing Insurance Crisis for Motorcoach Operators
Preliminary findings show 98% of operators faced premium increases over the past five years, while shrinking insurer participation is putting added pressure on businesses and customers.
Read More →
PSTA Modernizes Workforce Management with Digital Bidding System
The award-winning Workforce Transit Modernization project replaced paper bidding with a transparent digital platform, cutting administrative effort while improving access for operators.
Read More →
Chicago to Host Public Transportation's Biggest Gathering at APTA TRANSform & EXPO 2026
North America’s largest public transportation gathering returns to Chicago, connecting transit decision-makers with the technologies, ideas, and partnerships driving the industry forward.
Read More →
New Tricks for Old Bureaucracies: Joshua Schank on Making Transit Innovation Stick
Former LA Metro Chief Innovation Officer Joshua Schank discusses why good ideas aren't enough, how transit agencies can overcome resistance to change, and why today's challenges demand more innovation.
Read More →
Washington's Community Transit Sets Six-Year Roadmap for Growth, Expansion
Approved TDP targets more bus service, new mobility options, Swift BRT expansion, and a potential Everett Transit annexation.
Read More →
OKC Streetcar Makes Zero-Fare Service Permanent
Ridership increased an average of 71% compared with the same period a year earlier during the fare-free pilot.
Read More →
DART Customer Satisfaction Reaches Six-Year High
Overall satisfaction rose to 74.9%, while the agency’s Net Promoter Score reached a record 33.7.
Read More →
House Surface Transportation Bill Advances as Transit Funding Debate Intensifies
A bipartisan transportation package moving through Congress could redefine how the U.S. funds highways, transit, and motorcoach travel, while igniting new fights over electrification, regulation, and federal priorities.
Read More →
How Data, Strategy, and Community Engagement Are Reshaping Transit
In this edition of METROspectives, strada360 CEO Steve Lassey discusses how transit agencies can better align planning with operations, leverage data to improve decision-making, and build public trust as they prepare for the future of mobility.
Read More →
Amtrak Board Advances Plan to Restructure Organization, Seeks Public Input
The proposal, developed by Amtrak management and approved by the board for further consideration, is intended to modernize the organization's structure while improving accountability, operational efficiency, and customer service.
Read More →