US DOT Gives Guidance on Competitive Grants
After a directive was issued to review competitive grant programs, the U.S. Department of Transportation has issued guidance addressing questions regarding energy, climate change, diversity, and equity.

The U.S. DOT has provided guidance on its required competitive grant review, including which specific presidential policies apply and an outline of steps to take after the review.
Photo: USDOT/Canva
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) recently issued guidance regarding the directive for all modal agencies to review all competitive grant programs and awards, including a project-by-project review. These reviews include programs run by the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Railroad Administration.
Guidance on What Policies Apply
The reviews are to identify project scope and activities that allocate funding to advance priorities counter to the Trump Administration’s executive orders, including climate, energy, diversity, and equity projects.
Policies that apply to the review are outlined in Executive Order 14148, Executive Order 14154, Executive Order 14151, Executive Order 14168, secretarial Order 2100.7, and the Secretarial Memorandum on Implementation of Executive Orders Addressing Energy, Climate Change, Diversity, and Gender.
This guidance applies to competitive award selections made after January 20, 2021, without grant agreements or partially obligated grant agreements. Projects with executed grant agreements that are fully obligated are outside the scope of the provided guidance.
Identifying Components Against Current Presidential Policy
Modal agencies are to identify programs that may include any elements such as equity activities, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion activities, climate change activities, environmental justice activities, and gender-specific activities. Programs with the primary purpose of bicycle infrastructure, electric vehicles (EV), and electric vehicle charging infrastructure must also be identified.
Projects with any of the above elements will be subject to a project-by-project review if they meet specific criteria. Project-by-project reviews will examine and flag any project scope elements or activities for potential removal, such as:
Project activities such as equity analysis, green infrastructure, bicycle infrastructure, EV and/or EV charging infrastructure.
Project purpose or primary project benefits that include equity and/or climate such as projects that purposefully improve the condition for EJ communities or actively reduce GHG emissions.
Steps to Take After Elements Have Been Identified
Agencies must recommend to the Office of the Secretary which project sections should continue in their current form, be revised with a reduced or modified scope, or be canceled entirely based on their review.
Agencies will negotiate with the project sponsor to update the project scope to eliminate and replace identified project elements that align with the program statute, scope of the project sponsor’s application, and Trump Administration executive orders if a project is revised.
If the project sponsor does not agree to remove project elements, the DOT has directed agencies to proceed with a reduced award, removing the flagged scope and activities.
More News: HID Mass Transit Report Highlights 5 Key Priorities for 2025
More Management

STraffic Expands North American Presence with Fare Collection Technology
Deck: John Moon, Associate Director, Product Strategy at STraffic, discusses the company's growth in North America, its efforts to reduce fare evasion, and more.
Read More →
Study: Denver RTD Generates $2.1 Billion in Annual Economic Activity
An economic impact study finds the agency supports approximately 17,500 jobs, delivers $1.6 billion in annual community and mobility benefits, and generates $2.42 in economic value for every dollar invested.
Read More →
Mark Aesch Nominated to Lead Federal Transit Administration
The former Rochester transit chief and TransPro founder, who has also contributed to METRO Magazine, brings decades of industry experience and a focus on performance, accountability, and financial sustainability to the nomination.
Read More →
Best and Worst U.S. Cities for Public Transportation in 2026
A new analysis of 50 major U.S. urban areas ranks public transit systems based on accessibility, affordability, usefulness, and safety, highlighting where transit performs best and where challenges remain.
Read More →
Laketran Cuts Fuel Costs, Boosts Efficiency with Propane-Powered Fleet
The Ohio transit agency is using propane-powered vehicles and on-site fueling infrastructure to cut fuel and maintenance costs while meeting growing demand for paratransit services.
Read More →
Canada’s Public Transit Supports $65.6 Billion in Annual GDP
New research from the Canadian Chamber of Commerce examines transit's economic contributions, including job creation and the financial implications of transportation investment.
Read More →
Pierce Transit Moves to Expand Fleet Following Proposition 1 Approval
The agency authorized the purchase or refurbishment of up to 60 buses to support a 47% service expansion, as voters nationwide approved billions in new transit funding.
Read More →
Right-Sizing Rural Transit: Lessons from North Grenville’s On-Demand Model
A small municipality shows how flexible service, rider needs, and public accountability can expand mobility with limited resources.
Read More →
Transit Ballot Victories Signal Strong Voter Support: What Comes Next?
Voters approved billions in public transportation investments in 2026, giving agencies opportunities to preserve service, expand operations, and strengthen regional connections amid a changing political landscape.
Read More →
Transit Expands Agency Partnerships, Reaching 200 Official App Partners
COO Jake Sion discusses Transit’s growth, the success of its Transit Royale program, and how technology is helping agencies improve the rider experience.
Read More →