Much attention was given to a recent New York Times article that detailed how organized anti-transit forces came together to defeat May’s ballot initiative in Nashville, Tenn.
by James Blue, GM
August 8, 2018
The real arguments that these anti-transit forces make, however, is against government generally — except when used to promote highways and auto usage.
Capital Metro
2 min to read
The real arguments that these anti-transit forces make, however, is against government generally — except when used to promote highways and auto usage.
Capital Metro
Much attention was given to a recent New York Times article that detailed how organized anti-transit forces came together to defeat May’s ballot initiative in Nashville, Tenn. While this has alarmed pro-transit forces across the political spectrum — yes, there are conservatives who also strongly support public transportation investments — it is not new. What is new is that this faction is much better financed and much more ideological, and proponents must be more prepared than ever for what will surely come to your city.
Anti-transit positions are not new To be sure, the Nashville situation, like the Cincinnati streetcar referenda contests, was much more complicated than outside money influencing the campaign. The troubles of the last mayors factored in both examples, in fact. As the New York Times article points out, however, this may be just the beginning.
Ad Loading...
Moreover, some of the opposition is not new. The Cato Institute’s Randall O’Toole, for example, has been a thorn in pro-transit campaigners’ sides for decades, and much of his and his allies’ rhetoric at best uses dated evidence, and worse, employs radicalized arguments about crime supported by cherry-picked data. Even their latest hits, which suggest that automated and connected vehicles as well as ride-sharing services will obviate the need for transit services, have little evidentiary support and may, in fact, be contradicted by the most recent studies. And, put aside (at least for now) the decades of public transportation law that must be grappled with, such as Buy America, labor protections, employee drug and alcohol testing, and even vehicle-testing regulations that haven’t really found court cases yet, but are likely to come if these trends were ever to grow significantly.
The real arguments that these anti-transit forces make, however, is against government generally — except when used to promote highways and auto usage. For the money behind these groups is rooted in organizations like Americans for Prosperity, a group largely funded by oil, gas, and coal interests, and which deny links of climate change to human activity.
Get ready for the backlash Public transportation has enjoyed constant success at all levels of government in the U.S. for more than two decades now, and many of those contests are hard-fought on legitimate, reasoned issues. What is coming are much more organized and well-funded attempts to undo all of this progress. The next major challenge may come in California in November, as a ballot initiative to undo recent legislation has qualified for the ballot. Pro-transit forces must be equally well-organized and up to the task.
A new study found commuters in several major U.S. cities could save hundreds of dollars each month by taking public transit instead of driving, with Los Angeles ranking as the nation’s most expensive city for car commuters.
HDR’s transit program management lead discusses the challenges of overseeing large capital projects, adapting to cost and supply chain pressures, and the capabilities agencies need to build for the future.
Over the three days, PRT recorded 485,000 rides, reflecting the extraordinary number of trips taken as people traveled throughout the region for Draft events, work, and daily life.
Garo Hovnanian explores how agencies can better navigate competing priorities, strengthen decision-making, and prepare for a future shaped by electrification and emerging mobility.
The plan includes investments in cleaner vehicles and upgraded stations, NJT LiveView to provide real-time GPS tracking of train and light rail service, enhanced safety initiatives through a new Real Time Crime Center, and the debut of a redesigned NJ TRANSIT mobile app.
ABQ RIDE Forward is the first transit system overhaul in more than 25 years. This latest phase marks 15% completion of the 16-phase rollout, which will continue over the next several years.
During the meeting, the board approved a resolution invalidating a previously amended contract and authorized Board Chair Ann Duplessis to negotiate a separation agreement with CEO Lona Edwards Hankins.
The Pilot Program for TOD Planning helps support FTA’s mission of improving America’s communities through public transportation by providing funding to local communities to integrate land use and transportation planning with a new fixed-guideway or core-capacity transit capital investment.