Much attention was given to a recent New York Times article that detailed how organized anti-transit forces came together to defeat May’s ballot initiative in Nashville, Tenn.
by James Blue, GM
August 8, 2018
The real arguments that these anti-transit forces make, however, is against government generally — except when used to promote highways and auto usage.
Capital Metro
2 min to read
The real arguments that these anti-transit forces make, however, is against government generally — except when used to promote highways and auto usage.
Capital Metro
Much attention was given to a recent New York Times article that detailed how organized anti-transit forces came together to defeat May’s ballot initiative in Nashville, Tenn. While this has alarmed pro-transit forces across the political spectrum — yes, there are conservatives who also strongly support public transportation investments — it is not new. What is new is that this faction is much better financed and much more ideological, and proponents must be more prepared than ever for what will surely come to your city.
Anti-transit positions are not new To be sure, the Nashville situation, like the Cincinnati streetcar referenda contests, was much more complicated than outside money influencing the campaign. The troubles of the last mayors factored in both examples, in fact. As the New York Times article points out, however, this may be just the beginning.
Ad Loading...
Moreover, some of the opposition is not new. The Cato Institute’s Randall O’Toole, for example, has been a thorn in pro-transit campaigners’ sides for decades, and much of his and his allies’ rhetoric at best uses dated evidence, and worse, employs radicalized arguments about crime supported by cherry-picked data. Even their latest hits, which suggest that automated and connected vehicles as well as ride-sharing services will obviate the need for transit services, have little evidentiary support and may, in fact, be contradicted by the most recent studies. And, put aside (at least for now) the decades of public transportation law that must be grappled with, such as Buy America, labor protections, employee drug and alcohol testing, and even vehicle-testing regulations that haven’t really found court cases yet, but are likely to come if these trends were ever to grow significantly.
The real arguments that these anti-transit forces make, however, is against government generally — except when used to promote highways and auto usage. For the money behind these groups is rooted in organizations like Americans for Prosperity, a group largely funded by oil, gas, and coal interests, and which deny links of climate change to human activity.
Get ready for the backlash Public transportation has enjoyed constant success at all levels of government in the U.S. for more than two decades now, and many of those contests are hard-fought on legitimate, reasoned issues. What is coming are much more organized and well-funded attempts to undo all of this progress. The next major challenge may come in California in November, as a ballot initiative to undo recent legislation has qualified for the ballot. Pro-transit forces must be equally well-organized and up to the task.
METRO’s People Movement highlights the latest leadership changes, promotions, and personnel news across the public transit, motorcoach, and people mobility sectors.
BART began offering select parking lots to non-BART riders to generate new revenue to help address its FY27 $376M operating budget deficit brought on by remote work.
Drawing on decades of industry experience, Evans-Benson offered insights into the differences between the two, along with tips for better customer engagement and more.
The renewals include continued operations at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida; the PRTC in Virginia; and RTC Washoe in Nevada.
The governor’s proposed auto insurance reforms could save the agency $48 million annually by limiting payouts in crashes where buses are not primarily at fault.
What truly drives the cost of a paratransit fleet? Beyond the purchase price, seven operational factors quietly determine maintenance frequency, downtime, and long-term service reliability. This whitepaper explores how these factors shape lifecycle cost and what agencies should evaluate when selecting paratransit vehicles.
In this conversation, TBC’s Executive Director Ed Redfern, President Corey Aldridge, and Washington Representative Joel Rubin outline the coalition’s key policy priorities, the challenges facing transit agencies, and how industry stakeholders can work together to strengthen the voice of bus transit at the federal level.
Amanda Wanke, who has worked at DART for 10 years, including the past 2½ years as CEO, will join Metro Transit as deputy chief operating officer, operations administration.