Created specifically for communicators, APTA's Marketing and Communications Workshop Crisis Communications session, held in Miami in February, walked attendees through a scenario consisting of
three incidents.
Nicole Schlosser・Former Executive Editor
April 18, 2012
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority participated in a drill exercise that walked attendees through a terrorist attack scenario at APTA’s Marketing and Communications Workshop Crisis Communications session. The agency routinely conducts its own emergency exercises.
6 min to read
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority participated in a drill exercise that walked attendees through a terrorist attack scenario at APTA’s Marketing and Communications Workshop Crisis Communications session. The agency routinely conducts its own emergency exercises.
Created specifically for communicators, the American Public Transportation Association’s (APTA) Marketing and Communications Workshop Crisis Communications session, held in Miami in February, walked attendees through a scenario consisting of three incidents: two explosions in a Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) bus station, one explosion in a Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) station and white powder found on a South Florida Regional Transportation Authority bus.
Panelists included officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and communications staff members from each transit agency.
Ad Loading...
It was the first time that a security communications drill about attacks on public transportation was offered, Virginia Miller, senior manager, media relations, APTA, says.
“Everyone in the room was in the communications department for transit systems,” she explains. “While individual transit systems have gone through different exercises with local police, firemen and their Mayor’s offices, they had never before sat in a room with their colleagues and just focused on public transportation.”
The session opened with Miller discussing ISACs, national and critical infrastructures to build and maintain information sharing and analysis centers. The public transportation sector has its own ISAC, which APTA manages. It collects and analyzes threat information from government and open sources and is available on a 24/7 basis.
“All APTA members have access to the ISAC,” Miller says. “If something was to ever happen, ISAC would have information out to public transit systems stating what has happened and what the facts are at that moment.”
The three federal panelists spoke about their respective agencies’ roles, what would be going on in the government if something were to happen on U.S. transit systems, and about transit agencies reaching out to federal and local stakeholders to share information. Panelist Lisa Farbstein, public affairs specialist and spokesperson, office of strategic communications & public affairs, TSA, says each federal panelist also explained how they work together and with transit agencies in the event of an incident.
Ad Loading...
Panelists also covered how communicators need to be in that loop and ask questions, find out about what his or her agency is doing, and communicate that to passengers. “You put out word, ‘Something happened in city X and we are monitoring that situation and taking the following proactive steps.’ You want your public to know that,” Farbstein says.
Additionally, transit agencies should all share the same message and ensure they are communicating shared messages among each other.
Drill exercise The drill scenario presented a day of terrorist attacks on the East Coast and the West Coast and reviewed procedures both at public transit systems and in the government. First there was an explosion in the morning during rush hour at the Five Points MARTA bus station and another explosion at the same station 14 minutes later.
Also in the exercise, Miller explains, after the two bombings at MARTA, the DHS at different points in the day held a National Incident Communications Conference Line (NICCL) call for federal and transit agencies. NICCL is used to coordinate public information efforts with federal partners during a threat or an incident, Chad Wood, risk communications specialist, office of public affairs, DHS, says.
[PAGEBREAK]
One of the incidents presented in the workshop drill exercise was an explosion in San Francisco-based BART’s busy Embarcadero station.
Cara Hodgson, manager of communications, MARTA, discussed how she and her colleagues would respond to such an incident.
Ad Loading...
“Our police department would close down the system [and employ] our explosive detection team,” she explains. “We would also work with the TSA in Atlanta as well as the City of Atlanta and Cobb County Police Departments to evacuate the area, ensuring that no other incidents occurred.”
Hodgson adds that MARTA communications staff would immediately notify customers and employees by reaching out to media and posting information on the agency’s social media sites. Additionally, MARTA has a phone line available just for employees to call.
“If there was an emergency we would update that and the phone system for customers so we could get the message out that we were having an emergency and having to evacuate the system and provide any additional information,” Hodgson says.
The second incident presented in the drill was an explosion at BART. Luna Salaver, communications officer, BART, and public information officer, Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority, discussed what would happen, whether or not they would shut down services, and how that would be communicated.
“By the time the situation the West Coast, it was at our Embarcadero station at about 9:00 a.m.,” Salaver says of the drill. “I told the attendees that when the situation started on the East Coast, our folks would have already been on alert. That’s what happened on 9/11. Before the second plane hit the World Trade Center our folks were already looking at the downtown stations and deploying our canine units.”
Ad Loading...
Salaver added that the station would be shut down and treated as a crime scene. BART would also shut down other nearby areas and stations. BART’s first priorities would be to get the word out the passengers who are on the system and explain to all customers why the station was shut down, utilizing PA announcements, messages on digital signage, alerts posted on its website, employ its media voice mail line and advise its media partners.
Attendee feedback Many attendees walked away from the drill with awareness that they had some homework to do, Miller says. For example, several attendees didn’t know about ISAC, let alone who gets the ISAC alerts at their transit systems.
Gerry Carpenter, Utah Transit Authority spokesperson, says that the most valuable part of the drill for him was realizing that all transit agencies are potential terrorism targets and learning how to prepare a communications plan.
“When we talk homeland security and terrorism, I always thought big cities: New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles. [Being in] Salt Lake City, I never thought I would have to worry about it. But, one thing that really came out bluntly to me [is] that everywhere is a potential target and it doesn’t matter what size your city is. Oklahoma City [was used as an] example,” he explains. “One of the greatest concerns is domestic acts of terrorism, [which] certainly can happen anywhere. I need to think about developing the plans for how I, as a PIO would [handle] any sort of a threat of this kind affecting my system. As a PIO I had never really considered how it could potentially affect me. It was really an eye-opening experience.”
Attendee Joan Strazewski, public relations manager, GRTC Transit System agrees.
Ad Loading...
“Richmond, [Va.] is a small market. On the other hand, we should all be on extra alert when we see that somebody in our business has been attacked,” she says. “Honestly, I hadn’t thought in terms of us going to alert status to watch the progress of what’s happening at another place and enacting initial steps here because of activities at other sites. I really had my eyes opened about the impact to all of us when this happens to one of us.”
Hodgson says she heard several attendees agree that having tabletop exercises and drills throughout the year is very important to ensure that an agency’s communications are in place.
Complete Parts features new branding with a new logo, a new contact telephone number, a dedicated order desk, enhanced processes and inventory, all designed to provide the parts bus operations need.
Accessible transit isn’t a feature—it’s a responsibility. This whitepaper explores how the Low-Floor Frontrunner is redefining mobility with a breakthrough design that removes barriers, empowers riders, and delivers measurable operational advantages for agencies. Discover why this next generation minibus is setting a new standard for inclusive transportation.
SEPTA was awarded $43 million in competitive grant funding from the FTA's FY25 Low and No Emission and Bus and Bus Facilities grant programs to support this procurement.
In part 1 of a two-part conversation, AC Transit’s director of maintenance joins co-hosts Alex Roman and Mark Hollenbeck to discuss his journey from the U.S. Marines to public transit and the role mentorship plays in developing the next generation of industry leaders.
When construction is complete, battery-electric buses will operate from the Arborway facility on Day One, providing cleaner, quieter, and more reliable service for riders, the MBTA said. After completion, the old facility will be demolished, and the land will be made available for redevelopment.
Nadine S. Lee, who has served as president/CEO since July 2021, said the decision comes after careful reflection on the agency’s progress and its path forward.
In this conversation, TBC’s Executive Director Ed Redfern, President Corey Aldridge, and Washington Representative Joel Rubin outline the coalition’s key policy priorities, the challenges facing transit agencies, and how industry stakeholders can work together to strengthen the voice of bus transit at the federal level.
What truly drives the cost of a paratransit fleet? Beyond the purchase price, seven operational factors quietly determine maintenance frequency, downtime, and long-term service reliability. This whitepaper explores how these factors shape lifecycle cost and what agencies should evaluate when selecting paratransit vehicles.