Looking Back: Burns Engineering's Payne Talks Passenger Rail and More
New Study Reveals Why Progressive Design-Build is Reshaping Infrastructure
Early collaboration, shared risk, better outcomes — why Progressive Design-Build is fast becoming a go-to delivery method in infrastructure.

According to the ACEC Research Institute study, 76% of respondents have engaged in PDB projects, with 88% reporting increased project volumes and 81% noting rising construction values over the past five years.
Photo: Life Of Pix via Pexels
The ACEC Research Institute recently released a report unveiling industry insights on Progressive Design-Build (PDB), a project delivery method gaining traction for its collaborative structure and risk-balanced outcomes.
The Phase 1 report titled “Progressive Design-Build: Practice, Perception, and Potential” is led by Dr. Keith Molenaar, dean of engineering at the University of Colorado-Boulder, and surveyed 581 engineering firm leaders across 439 firms.
According to the study, 76% of respondents have engaged in PDB projects, with 88% reporting increased project volumes and 81% noting rising construction values over the past five years. These trends are fueled by the demand for more integrated and transparent delivery models, especially in sectors such as transportation, water and wastewater, aviation, and public and private buildings.
Rising Adoption and Industry Satisfaction Signals Confidence
A reported 79% of industry stakeholders say they are satisfied or very satisfied with the PDB approach. Minimal dissatisfaction (only 6%) underscores the growing reputation of PDB as a preferred method in markets that demand accountability, early collaboration, and flexible project evolution.
The report highlights several reasons behind PDB’s success:
Early and Iterative Planning: Owners and builders collaborate from the outset to refine scope, cost, and schedule.
Shared Risk and Transparency: PDB leads all delivery models in effective risk allocation (4.2/5 average rating), reducing conflicts and rework.
Owner Empowerment: Continuous engagement enables cost-informed decisions and greater control.
Strong Team Dynamics: Integrated teams foster trust and real-time problem-solving.
However, despite its momentum, the report also identifies a few challenges:
Regulatory Constraints: Public sector projects are constrained by FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulations).
Insurance Hurdles: Smaller firms struggle to meet high policy requirements.
Knowledge Gaps: Limited owner familiarity and institutional inertia hinder wider adoption.
“Progressive Design-Build offers a transformative approach to delivering infrastructure and buildings,” said Daphne Bryant, executive director of the ACEC Research Institute. “With the right policy updates and increased awareness, PDB can help the industry build smarter, faster, and with less conflict.”
The ACEC Research Institute calls on industry stakeholders to participate in the following research phase by contributing case studies of completed PDB projects. These will help refine best practices and inform actionable guidance on equitable risk-sharing, insurance strategies, dispute avoidance, and pricing transparency.
More Management

New Tricks for Old Bureaucracies: Joshua Schank on Making Transit Innovation Stick
Former LA Metro Chief Innovation Officer Joshua Schank discusses why good ideas aren't enough, how transit agencies can overcome resistance to change, and why today's challenges demand more innovation.
Read More →
Washington's Community Transit Sets Six-Year Roadmap for Growth, Expansion
Approved TDP targets more bus service, new mobility options, Swift BRT expansion, and a potential Everett Transit annexation.
Read More →
OKC Streetcar Makes Zero-Fare Service Permanent
Ridership increased an average of 71% compared with the same period a year earlier during the fare-free pilot.
Read More →
DART Customer Satisfaction Reaches Six-Year High
Overall satisfaction rose to 74.9%, while the agency’s Net Promoter Score reached a record 33.7.
Read More →
House Surface Transportation Bill Advances as Transit Funding Debate Intensifies
A bipartisan transportation package moving through Congress could redefine how the U.S. funds highways, transit, and motorcoach travel, while igniting new fights over electrification, regulation, and federal priorities.
Read More →
How Data, Strategy, and Community Engagement Are Reshaping Transit
In this edition of METROspectives, strada360 CEO Steve Lassey discusses how transit agencies can better align planning with operations, leverage data to improve decision-making, and build public trust as they prepare for the future of mobility.
Read More →
Amtrak Board Advances Plan to Restructure Organization, Seeks Public Input
The proposal, developed by Amtrak management and approved by the board for further consideration, is intended to modernize the organization's structure while improving accountability, operational efficiency, and customer service.
Read More →
Turn Transit Data Into Action
Discover how leading agencies are using connected technology to gain real-time visibility across operations, improve service reliability, and reduce disruptions.
Read More →
What Transit-Oriented Development Means for the Future of Public Transportation
Once viewed primarily as transit operators, agencies are now leveraging land, partnerships, and long-term planning to boost ridership, expand housing, and strengthen communities.
Read More →
USDOT Announces $22 Million for Transit Innovation, Updates High-Speed Rail Rules
New federal transit funding will support safety, accessibility, and technology projects as updated rail regulations establish new noise standards for high-speed trains.
Read More →