No matter the locale — rural or urban — transit and paratransit vehicles utilizing alternative fuels have to be ready for anything in Michigan’s diverse terrain. 

Urban applications often deal with limited space for fueling, while rural applications have plenty of space, but some drivers deal with range anxiety when it comes to fuels other than gasoline and diesel.

What fuel should be chosen to slash emissions and manage costs? According to Whitney Ehresman, transportation director for Allegan County Transportation, a reservation-based bus system located in rural western Michigan, there are plenty of alternatives, each with its own merits.

But in doing her homework, one fuel stood out — propane autogas.

“Whether an agency decides to transition to propane autogas, CNG, or another fuel source, there is a lot of support and encouragement,” says Ehresman. “No alternative fuel source is better than the other. Each has its own set of benefits, and for us, propane was a natural fit.”

Allegan County Transportation, which is located south of Grand Rapids on Lake Michigan, operates seven Ford E-450 propane autogas buses. That adds up to a quarter of the agency’s fleet. 

In their first eight months, starting in mid-2023, the buses traveled a combined 75,000 miles, saving the agency more than $150,000 in fuel costs. 

Overcoming Propane Misconceptions

Ehresman says there have been public misconceptions when it comes to propane.

“We have received a lot of questions from individuals regarding safety,” she says. “There is a high level of safety measures in place with the propane fuel systems, including a tank that is 20 times more puncture-resistant than its gasoline or diesel counterparts. Through our planning processes at the county, we are committed to being proactive, rather than reactive, when it comes to safety.”

Another misconception the agency has heard is about cost, a vital issue for all transportation agencies, rural or urban. Allegan County Transportation was able to lock in a low rate for propane. 

The county estimates savings of about 50% on fuel costs and 70% on maintenance costs. 

“Initially, we received some questions about the local propane supply, but once we got out there and began researching, we found that there are a lot of local and regional options for propane, which is encouraging from a planning standpoint,” says Ehresman. “Our long-term plans involve having a fueling site at our transportation facility, which is an option a lot of agencies have been investing due to a federal rebate that is available to encourage on-site refueling.”

There are also misconceptions about range and driveability. 

Ehresman and her team wanted to ensure drivers were comfortable with operating propane autogas vehicles, due to the distance in particular. 

“Our drivers are excited,” she says. “These vehicles are quieter and warm up faster during the winter months, which is really an essential feature in regions that experience more frigid temperatures seasonally.”

Cost Savings for Urban Agencies

There are more than 7,000 transit buses equipped with propane autogas fuel systems in operation across North America. Roughly 500 are in Michigan, and it’s not just rural transit agencies that are using them. 

For example, Flint Mass Transportation Authority (MTA) operates well over 100 Ford E-450s and more than 50 Blue Bird Vision commercial buses.

For GM Edgar H. Benning, cost savings is key.

“Propane is the ideal fuel to drive down operational costs and to carry our commitment to reducing our exposure to unstable imported fuel prices,” Benning explains.

Benning has received inquiries from transit agencies around the nation and even internationally about its propane program.

Over a five-year period, Flint MTA saved over $4 million using propane. 

“With propane, we’re saving almost as much in preventative maintenance as we are with the fuel,” says Benning.

Grand Rapids is a hotbed for propane transit activity. 

Peter Varga is the CEO of The Rapid, which operates 47 Ford E-450s, the go-to vehicle for transit agencies throughout the state. 

“We know propane works in our climate and the vehicles have a very similar engine so the maintenance program is the same,” says Varga. “It is also important that propane is produced here in the United States, supporting American jobs and reducing dependency on foreign oil.”

Steven Clapp, director of fleet maintenance, adds if one were to compare The Rapid’s fleet of 100% propane paratransit vehicles to a gasoline fleet, The Rapid would save 1.7 million kg of CO2 every 18 months.

Across town, Hope Network Transportation operates 25 Ford E-450 propane buses. 

The agency saved about $35,000 by owning its own propane tank on its lot. And regarding the practical aspects of getting from Point A to Point B and back again, one driver says, “With this propane vehicle, it’s quieter, smoother and a lot more enjoyable.”

Propane ROI is “Astronomical”

Returning to the countryside, Clinton Transit in St. Johns, north of the state capital of Lansing, is enjoying up to 30% in fuel cost savings.

“We’ve been running on propane for approximately six years, and the return on investment is astronomical,” says Clinton Transit’s Operations Manager Ty Piontek. “Not just for the environment, but for the people funding the transit authority.”

Another major advantage to Clinton Transit is fueling. A driver’s ability to drive up to an onsite fueling station and complete that task in minutes was a game-changer.

Getting an onsite fueling station isn’t hard, he said. “Oftentimes, you’ll find that your propane provider will provide you with a tank and a fueling station under a lease agreement, which behooves both parties for a long-term contract,” says Piontek.

Charlevoix County Transit has had the same experience. 

The agency, based in Boyne City, in the cold far north of the lower peninsula, operates 13 Ford E-450 buses. It worked with its propane provider to install an onsite fueling station in exchange for a fuel contract that locks in the cost. 

For agencies that don’t have a budget or room for an onsite fueling station, mobile fueling is an option. A local propane provider’s bobtail truck will arrive at a fleet site and refuel the buses one by one.

Immediate Payback and Healthier Environment

Of course, if you’re talking about propane transit vehicles in Michigan, you can’t leave out its biggest urban center — Detroit. 

SMART, or Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation, operates 114 Ford E-450s, and they’ve made a big difference locally, according to director of maintenance Keith Taylor.

“I would encourage every transit agency to explore the benefits of a propane autogas-fueled fleet,” says Taylor, who noted that SMART utilizes an onsite fueling station. “You’ll get an immediate payback in lower fuel costs and a healthier environment.”

There’s another important aspect of using propane in Michigan and across the nation. 

Not only is propane autogas the leading alternative fuel in the U.S., more than 90% of the U.S. propane autogas supply is produced domestically, with an additional 7% from Canada.

Additionally, more renewable propane is entering the marketplace. 

Renewable propane, or biopropane, is made from feedstocks like wood waste, plants, and animal fats. While conventional propane offers ultra-low emissions, renewable propane is even lower.

“We’re reaping the benefits of propane on a daily basis,” says Taylor. “Not only were we interested in the cost savings of the fuel and lower maintenance costs, but we also wanted to help make an impact on the environment with clean propane autogas.”