Several organizations throughout the world are engaged in benchmarking public transport services. Unfortunately, they have not fulfilled their promise largely because the leadership needed to sustain the projects has fizzled. Let me first define benchmarking. Put simply, it is observing what similar organizations do and coming up with statistical ways to compare them. The data-oriented measures are typically, but not always, financial. Public transport officials came up with a variety of benchmarks. For buses they include: mean distance between roadcalls as a reliability measure, number of service hours per bus or passengers per service as examples of productivity measures. For rail properties, mean distance between failures, passengers per employee and passengers per hour per direction are a few benchmarks used. For both modes, cost per passenger and farebox recovery ratios (the percentage of service cost paid for by fare income) are also used frequently. Some even look at modal splits on particular corridors of certain population densities. No dearth of benchmarks As you can see, there are all kinds of measures public transport organizations can use to develop comparisons. Similarly, there are a variety of benchmarking projects already underway or completed on a small scale. For example, several Transit Cooperative Research Project studies discuss benchmarking in various quality improvement projects. There was also a benchmarking project done by the Texas Transportation Institute and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Volpe Center in Cambridge, Mass., on staff training. Two others are worthy of mention. The International Public Transport Union (UITP) is involved with the European Commission’s transport department (DG VII) on customer-oriented benchmarks to develop quality systems measures to help governments with policies on competitive contracting and subsidy levels. You can monitor the progress of this initiative by going to the UITP’s Website www.uitp.com. Meanwhile, the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corp., a multimodal system in Hong Kong, has been soliciting agencies around the world for years for a global urban passenger rail benchmarking initiative it is trying to develop. The problem with those wonderful initiatives is they have faced tough sledding when it comes to wide-scale adoption and participation. I suspect that it boils down to two reasons. First, many people correctly point out that trying to come up with such benchmarks, especially performance-oriented outcomes, too often results in comparing apples to oranges. Operating conditions vary widely, depending on national laws and customs, city vs. rural locations, size of the city, population densities and on and on. Is benchmarking too scary? There is also a second, perhaps bigger problem: Benchmarking is scary. By developing comparisons, particularly averages, some people will inherently have to explain why their organizations fall below the norms. Better to let the enthusiasm for benchmarking wane, and it will go away. Ultimately, such an attitude is a recipe for stagnation and losing relevance as a solution to urban congestion, pollution, socioeconomic opportunity and all the other worthy higher goals of public transport. Benchmarking must be taken seriously and championed. Meaningful standards must be developed. Better to do so rather than have outsiders do it for us, inaccurately and poorly. Which, sooner or later, will lead to more than a lost opportunity for real, quality improvements. It could lead to our industry’s downfall. And that’s the ultimate scary scenario.
Benchmarking projects need a jump start
Several organizations throughout the world are engaged in benchmarking public transport services.
More Management

Alstom Delivers First Multilevel III NJ TRANSIT Commuter Railcar
The delivery marks the first car in a 374‑vehicle order and begins the arrival of a new generation of higher‑capacity, more reliable, and more comfortable trains for one of the country’s busiest commuter rail systems.
Read More →
Cincinnati Metro Begins Countywide Bus Stop Sign Upgrade
Metro launches a 24-month project to replace 3,700 bus stop signs, introducing improved visibility, QR-enabled rider info, and expanded amenities across Hamilton County.
Read More →
San Francisco's BART Breaks Multiple Records for Post-Pandemic Ridership in March
BART recorded 5,403,140 exits in March, making it the highest monthly ridership since the pandemic and surpassing the previous high set in October 2025 (5,346,890 exits).
Read More →
Transit Leader Rod Diridon Sr., ‘Father of Modern Transit’ in Silicon Valley, Dies at 87
See how the longtime public servant and transportation visionary helped shape Bay Area transit systems and championed rail development nationwide.
Read More →
Intercity Bus Industry Outlook: A Mix of Apprehension & Optimism
Industry leaders see both promise and peril ahead as intercity bus travel rebounds, but unpredictable market forces threaten to reshape the sector.
Read More →
Philadelphia's SEPTA Celebrates New Ardmore Station
The station was rebuilt as part of SEPTA’s Station Accessibility Program, making it fully ADA accessible with new elevators, ramps, and high-level platforms.
Read More →
SEPTA Releases Proposed $2.7B Fiscal Year 2027 Budget
The plan represents an increase of just 1.9% over the current year, and includes investments in new buses, more full-length fare gates, and other enhancements for customers.
Read More →
Metra Reaches New 10-Year Agreement with BNSF
The announcement highlights the long-standing partnership between the Class I railroad and the commuter rail system, dating back to Metra's creation in 1983.
Read More →
Bus Tech Talk: AC Transit’s Cecil Blandon on Leadership, Mentorship, and a Career in Transit
In Part 1, Blandon shares his journey from the U.S. Marines to a leadership role in public transit, along with insights on mentorship and professional growth within the industry.
Read More →
Last Chance: Be A Part of METRO's Annual Buyer’s Guide
The revamped Buyer’s Guide will reach METRO’s audience of more than 17,000 print and digital subscribers, providing suppliers with year-round visibility in front of transit agency leaders, motorcoach operators, and industry decision-makers across North America.
Read More →
