ISO 9001 gets second thoughts: comments from the trenches
There is a growing body of evidence that these standards, to put it diplomatically, have not fulfilled their promise.
Long touted by the industry and some members of the press (this former full-time member being perhaps the lead offender), the ISO 9000 series of quality assurance standards was to give our industry the Holy Grail of improved quality of buses, railcars and transit services at lower or at least no greater cost. However, there is a growing body of evidence that these standards, to put it diplomatically, have not fulfilled their promise. Below are some recent comments from a variety of industry officials. I will keep them anonymous because this is a forum that invites frank discussion and thus is an invaluable tool for industry problem solving. Most of these come from the industry’s operating side, which were gleaned from a wonderful e-mail–based bus maintenance discussion group. (To subscribe go to http://gulliver. nationalacademies.org/~A1E16 and follow the instructions.) Yet you can rest assured that the supply side feels the same way, but were somewhat reluctant to admit it publicly because they felt that their customers did not share their skepticism. On the plus side… There are plenty of people who still think that ISO 9000 is a useful exercise. Moreover, the changes made in the 2000 edition are significant improvements to the earlier versions. (For more details, see METRO February/March 2001 for articles on the subject.) “In the long run, the implementation of a fully integrated quality system will enhance the bottom line of a company. The registration process serves to confirm the quality process and will add value by bringing to management an independent auditor’s point of view with respect to quality system improvement,” said Mark Burgess, director of quality assurance at Siemens Transportation Systems (Sacramento, Calif.), who was responsible for the initial registration to the ISO 9001 standard for two divisions within Siemens. However, he added, “That does not mean that there are any free lunches. Any company endeavoring to become registered in accordance with an ISO 9001 standard can expect a significant level of involvement and work at the staff level coupled with a significant initial and ongoing expense.” …but improvements needed There are many in the industry who are not as complimentary, however. “The ISO 9000 system promotes consistency and documentation in manufacturing processes, but does nothing to facilitate continuous product improvement,” argued a top official at the Bi-State Development Agency in St. Louis. “If anything, the ISO process slows down product improvement by imposing numerous paperwork steps that must be taken and documented to maintain certification. The criteria for the Malcolm Baldridge Award are far superior to the ISO system, as it is more geared to responsiveness and continuous product improvement,” the official said. Those are precisely the kinds of issues that the 2000 revision of the ISO standards was designed to address. It is much more focused on continuous improvement, top management commitment and customer involvement, for example. An official at the Los Angles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority agrees with the Bi-State assessment. “ISO certification is really just a regimented manufacturing process with a demonstrated quality control program in place,” he added. “Unfortunately, in the bus manufacturing business, that destroys the reflexes of the manufacturer and makes it very difficult for them to respond crisply to problems and concerns identified by the customer, before they proliferate.” Michael Wehr, director of maintenance for the Milwaukee County Transit System, summarized the sentiments for many of his colleagues this way: “The ISO 9000 certification is only as good as the quality assurance representatives that enforce the process at the affected company. I have found instances where the quality assurance is still a problem at an ISO-certified company and have experienced some substantial delays in correcting problems. The correction to a problem has to be documented in detail before it can be implemented. “When all is said and done, I believe it is overrated,” Wehr concluded. In short, the jury is still out, at least in the transit industry, and the 2000 edition of the standards, along with the companies that register and re-register to them, have a lot of convincing to do.
More Management

OCTA Approves $2 Billion Budget for FY 2026-27, Prioritizing Transit Investments
More than half of the agency’s upcoming spending plan is dedicated to transit as OCTA balances infrastructure investment with fiscal stability.
Read More →
Joshua Schank on Transportation Innovation, Risk, and the Future of Mobility
In this edition of METROspectives, Joshua Schank discusses lessons from launching LA Metro’s Office of Extraordinary Innovation, the challenges of advancing new mobility technologies, and much more.
Read More →
Reinventing Fleet Maintenance with Real-time Visibility and AI
Transit leaders need to know what needs fixing, where to look, who is responsible, when work is completed, and what it costs without having to chase information across disconnected systems.
Read More →
Alstom Acquires Delaware Site to Support Amtrak NextGen Acela Fleet
The company is investing more than $55 million to acquire and improve the property and will employ approximately 100 people at this site once it is operational.
Read More →
SamTrans Sets Priorities for Potential Connect Bay Area Revenue
The board-approved framework allocates future funding to maintaining service, rider improvements, equity initiatives, and infrastructure repairs.
Read More →
Federal Transit Officials Launch MARTA Safety Probe
FTA has given MARTA 15 days to provide records on crime prevention, fare evasion enforcement, and security funding as part of a broader safety investigation.
Read More →
ABA's Ferguson Testifies in Support of BUS Act, National Standards for Bus Operators
The BUSES Act would create a nationwide framework preventing state and local governments from enforcing bus idling restrictions of less than 15 minutes, a threshold consistent with existing Environmental Protection Agency guidance.
Read More →
When Routine Fails: How Public Transit Must Adapt for the World Cup
The 2026 FIFA World Cup will test transit agencies’ ability to manage unpredictable travel patterns, making real-time data and operational flexibility critical to moving millions of visitors efficiently.
Read More →
Florida’s JTA Puts Innovation in Motion Ahead of America250
The agency unveiled a commemorative America250 bus during a visit from U.S. DOT's Seval Oz and showcased its autonomous mobility programs.
Read More →
California Selects Team for Nation’s First True High-Speed Rail Track and Systems Contract
The board action follows completion of track installation at the 150-acre southern railhead in Kern County, which will serve as the staging and distribution hub for high-speed track and systems installation.
Read More →