Small Starts revisions rebuff rail
It is now unlikely that streetcar systems will get much traditional transit funding, regardless of their appeal to local communities and national sustainability objectives.
In this past summer’s publication of its revised Small Starts criteria, the FTA could not have been clearer in its preference for BRT and its disdain for streetcars. Those who advocate and seek federal financial support for the latter must now rethink their strategy. Barring revision of federal transit law, it is now unlikely that streetcar systems will get much traditional transit funding, regardless of their appeal to local communities and national sustainability objectives.
In its Federal register notice of August 8, 2008, the FTA eliminated the requirement that all four project elements (low-floor buses, traffic signal priority/pre-emption, significant stations and branding) must be part of the project, and instead, now allows a project to be eligible if it includes at least three of the four elements. Previously, Small Starts projects that did not include a fixed- guideway (i.e., exclusive or mostly-exclusive BRT running way or track for rail projects) were not eligible for Small Starts funding if any of the four elements already existed in the corridor.
This change was made because the agency said it was concerned about how minor improvements already made in a corridor, such as the existence of one of the four required elements, prevented projects from being eligible for Small Starts funding.
“[FTA’s] intent for the Small Starts program has been to differentiate the program from the Section 5309 Bus Program by funding significant corridor improvements,” the agency explained in its announcement. “By revising the policy to allow projects in corridors with one of the existing elements to apply for Small Starts funding, FTA has attempted to strike a balance between being too restrictive so that many worthy projects are excluded from eligibility, and being too flexible, thus allowing eligibility for projects that are not significant corridor improvements but rather incremental improvements better funded under another program.”
This and other changes did nothing for rail-based Small Starts. In fact, by lowering the bar for bus-based projects once again, they put streetcars and commuter rail at further comparative disadvantage.
Forget the DOT?
Streetcar advocates formulating their strategy for the new
President and Congress are not happy with this state of affairs, and some are
expressing willingness to try a wholly different approach — seeking something
new in federal urban development programs outside of the Department of
Transportation (DOT). The rationale for this approach is based not only on
current and recent rules requiring additional documentation and analysis for
projects, which, frankly are not all that different from traditional “bigger”
starts and, thus, is an apparent violation of at least the spirit of
Congressional intent.
There is also some precedent for this approach, because many large transportation investments have also had a redevelopment component. Streetcars particularly fit this strategy because they are mainly about economic development and community revitalization and less about mobility issues.
Much of this strategy’s viability will depend on the political climate next year, of course. How Congress and the new administration will deal with mega-issues like the economy, two wars, climate change, energy security, the budget deficit and even healthcare will in part determine whether transportation funding will be decided as it has been or with new twists.
If Barack Obama becomes president, the urban agenda is likely to have a higher profile than John McCain, who has viewed federal transportation investments more skeptically. If this non-DOT tack is taken, it would be an ironic twist, for that is where federal transit funding began in the early 1960s before the DOT was created. Just as streetcars themselves represent an old-is-new again idea, perhaps federal policy must do the same.
More Management

Smarter Maintenance Starts with Risk, Not Routine
As infrastructure ages and funding pressures mount, effective asset management is becoming critical to maintaining safe, reliable transportation networks.
Read More →
OCTA Extends Senior Mobility Program Agreements Through 2031
The Measure M-funded program has provided nearly 3.5 million trips and will continue helping thousands of older adults maintain independence and access essential services.
Read More →
VIA's Silver Line Clears Environmental Review, Advances Toward Construction
The VIA Rapid Green Line is currently under construction, with service expected to begin in April 2028.
Read More →
Modernizing Mobility with CharterUP CEO Armir Harris
From digital transformation to evolving customer demands, CharterUP's Armir Harris offers his perspective on the transportation industry's next chapter.
Read More →
CTTC Enhances Transit Workforce Pipeline Through New Partnerships and Leadership
The group's latest initiatives focus on developing talent, expanding training opportunities and addressing workforce needs across the transit sector.
Read More →
San Diego MTS Keeps Service Intact With New FY 2027 Budget
The approved spending plan avoids route cuts and lays the groundwork for addressing transit funding challenges through the end of the decade.
Read More →
Solving The Driver Shortage: What Transit Agencies Can Learn From the Trucking Industry
See how transit agencies facing persistent driver shortages can learn from the trucking industry’s evolving strategies for recruitment, retention, workplace conditions, and more.
Read More →
FIFA World Cup Matches Are Driving Record Transit Ridership Nationwide
See how World Cup matches are generating record transit demand across North America, with ridership surpassing Super Bowls, concerts, and Olympic-era events.
Read More →
The Hidden Cost of Fuel Data Inaccuracy in Public Transit Fleets
In today's transit environment, accurate fuel and mileage data are critical to reducing costs, minimizing downtime, and improving fleet performance.
Read More →
Virginia's $28.5B Transportation Plan Targets Transit and Rail
Approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, the program supports ongoing infrastructure projects while providing new investments in transit, state of good repair and transportation alternatives.
Read More →