METRO Magazine Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Private bus industry seeks improvements to charter bus rules

Charter operators have experienced problems with local public transit agencies luring away customers with discounted rates.

by By Janna Starcic, Senior Editor
February 1, 2005
3 min to read


The private bus industry is stepping up its fight against public bus systems that violate charter bus rules and is lobbying the federal government for clearer regulatory language and more flexible penalties that would be easier to implement and enforce. Last July, a coalition made up of the American Bus Association (ABA), United Motorcoach Association (UMA), American Transit Services Council and many other associations sent a letter to Capitol Hill containing proposed amendments to a Senate transportation bill that seemed to give transit systems more latitude to provide charter bus service in competition with private bus operators. “We have provisions in both the House and Senate bill that we think will go at least part way to alleviating some of these problems,” says Clyde Hart Jr., ABA’s vice president of government affairs. A list of demands
The coalition’s aims include clarification of the language of the existing rules. “One of the things we are looking for is to have the law changed so it says ‘the Secretary of Transportation shall enforce the rules,’ rather than may,” says Linda Darr, ABA’s vice president, policy and external affairs. “Shall and may have very different meanings in legislation.” Another amendment goal is to impose different penalty levels. Currently, the law includes a monetary penalty that requires the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to withdraw all funding from the violator. “Unfortunately, the only penalty that exists today is all or nothing,” UMA President Victor Parra says. “That’s too severe for the level of violation. There is no in between.” Hart agrees, “It’s what I call the nuclear weapon that is never going to be used by the FTA.” The furthest the FTA has gone in terms of putting violators on notice is to issue a cease-and-desist order. The FTA “has not found it necessary to withdraw funding from a transit agency in order to obtain compliance,” says the FTA’s legal counsel. Transit agencies such as the Rochester (N.Y.) Genessee Regional Transportation Authority have ignored orders to cease-and-desist despite having been ordered to do so more than once, ABA’s Darr says. “I think part of the reason transit agencies don’t bother following procedures is because there is no real penalty and because of [their] constant search for money as a publicly funded agency.” Ongoing problems
Several years ago, the private bus industry brought the problem of unchecked charter rule violations to the attention of the U.S. Department of Transportation. “We saw unfair, unchecked competition from transit agencies that were eager for more money and stepping way outside of their bounds,” Darr says. Since that time, the FTA worked with the private bus industry to develop literature underscoring the charter rules, which was distributed to transit agencies and operators alike. “So we were off to a really good start, but I think what happened after that is politics intervened,” Darr says of the ongoing problem with penalizing violators. Despite attempts to control transit encroachment, the problem still exists. Williamsburg, Va-based Oleta Coachlines Inc. is one such operator that has had problems with transit competition. “[A regular customer] who had booked a trip to Charlottesville, N.C., called to tell us they no longer needed our services because they had found a very good rate from someone else,” says Howard Smith, Oleta’s founder and president. Smith found out that local transit operator Williamsburg (Va.) Area Transit (WAT) lured away his customer with a much lower rate. In order to keep the customer, Smith matched the offered rate and notified the WAT of its wrongdoing. After Smith attended meetings to speak out against the problem, WAT backed down. Smith adds, however, that another local public operation appears poised to create the same problems for Oleta. “It’s happening everywhere,” says UMA’s Parra. “Unfortunately, there is almost no accountability.” He says the private bus industry is deploying a different strategy to deal with this issue by going on the offensive.

Topics:Management
Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Management

Manhattan Congestion Relief Zone Sees Traffic Reduction
Managementby StaffJune 15, 2026

Q4 Travel Data Reveals Drop in Vehicle Traffic to Manhattan Congestion Zone

NYMTC’s quarterly Travel Patterns Report provides a snapshot of travel activity throughout New York City, Long Island, the Lower Hudson Valley, and northern New Jersey using data collected from the agencies operating the region’s bridges, tunnels, and public transit systems.

Read More →
A user demonstrating Metrolink's contactless fare payment pilot.
Technologyby StaffJune 12, 2026

Southern California's Metrolink Debuts Contactless Fare Payment Pilot

Customers traveling between Redlands and Los Angeles can now tap their preferred payment method, including a credit or debit card, mobile wallet, or wearable device, at station validators before boarding and again while exiting.

Read More →
A BART train on the tracks.
Managementby StaffJune 12, 2026

California's BART Approves FY27 Budget While Maintaining Service Levels

The budget covers July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, a period when pandemic emergency funds run out, the District faces a structural deficit of $375 million, and a regional transit funding measure may appear on the November ballot.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
An image of a ticket validator in front of a security gate.
Managementby Staff and News ReportsJune 12, 2026

STL Metro Transit To Launch Next-Generation Fare Collection and Security Gates

The St. Louis transit agency will begin the phased rollout of gated station access and integrated fare technology to improve security and the customer experience.

Read More →
An aerial view of the CATS light rail.
Managementby News/Media ReleaseJune 12, 2026

CATS FY27 Budget Prioritizes Safety, Service

New investments in security, service expansion, and rail development aim to improve the rider experience while keeping fares flat.

Read More →
A person holding up a TransLink Compass Soccer Mini to a navigation terminal.
Managementby Elora HaynesJune 11, 2026

Transit Agencies Nationwide Gear Up to Move World Cup Crowds

As millions of fans prepare to descend on host cities, transit leaders are turning a month-long global event into a proving ground for the future of customer experience, mobility, and crowd management.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
A blue and white OCTA public transit bus parked in the street.
Managementby Elora HaynesJune 9, 2026

OCTA Approves $2 Billion Budget for FY 2026-27, Prioritizing Transit Investments

More than half of the agency’s upcoming spending plan is dedicated to transit as OCTA balances infrastructure investment with fiscal stability.

Read More →
New MobilityJune 5, 2026

Joshua Schank on Transportation Innovation, Risk, and the Future of Mobility

In this edition of METROspectives, Joshua Schank discusses lessons from launching LA Metro’s Office of Extraordinary Innovation, the challenges of advancing new mobility technologies, and much more.

Read More →
A maintenance person with a tablet.
ManagementJune 5, 2026

Reinventing Fleet Maintenance with Real-time Visibility and AI

Transit leaders need to know what needs fixing, where to look, who is responsible, when work is completed, and what it costs without having to chase information across disconnected systems.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Alstom purchasing site for Acela network manufacturing
Railby StaffJune 4, 2026

Alstom Acquires Delaware Site to Support Amtrak NextGen Acela Fleet

The company is investing more than $55 million to acquire and improve the property and will employ approximately 100 people at this site once it is operational.

Read More →