As is the case with the pass program study, any changes in fares would first be reviewed by RTD’s senior leadership team, then approved by its board of directors. Photo via VXLA/Wikimedia
3 min to read
As is the case with the pass program study, any changes in fares would first be reviewed by RTD’s senior leadership team, then approved by its board of directors. Photo via VXLA/Wikimedia
A 25-member group of leaders asked to evaluate and determine whether changes should be made to Denver’s Regional Transportation District’s (RTD) pass programs completed its work, drafting a recommendation from its year-long effort that will be reviewed by the agency’s leadership team and its board of directors.
The working group — convened at the request of the public and at the direction of RTD’s 15-member board of directors — reviewed each of the agency’s individual and group passes and formulated several options, all of which were evaluated by a consultant for their impact on total fare revenue and ridership. As they deliberated, study participants considered eight guiding principles in their work: brand loyalty, convenience, cost-effectiveness, equitable access, increased ridership, an ability to meet strategic budget plan targets, revenue certainty, and simplifying rider-operator interactions. RTD’s pass programs last underwent a thorough review in 2009.
Ad Loading...
Working group members have no inherent authority to make changes to pass programs. RTD’s senior leadership team will review the group’s work at an internal meeting in March. The board of directors will receive an initial public update from staff at its next finance committee meeting, on March 13. No board decision is expected on that date. With board approval later this year, the earliest the public could experience any change resulting from the group’s recommendation would be early 2019.
Elements of the group’s recommendation include:
Adding a low-income pass, which would provide a 40% discount to qualifying riders whose incomes are at or below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines. This pass effectively serves as an expansion of the existing RTD nonprofit program, which has been in place for decades to assist low-income riders and would be retained.
Adding a youth pass, which would discount the fare for riders 13- through 19-years-old to 70%. Individuals 12-years-old and younger would ride free with a fare-paying rider.
Retaining EcoPass, Neighborhood EcoPass and CollegePass and pricing them based on updated service level areas (for EcoPass) and value of the trips taken (for Neighborhood EcoPass and CollegePass). The group is considering phasing in price increases of more than 20% for EcoPass holders, neighborhoods, and higher education institutions.
The group’s deliberations and modeling presumed that RTD’s board of directors would review fares, as it does periodically, later this year and determine whether to make adjustments to them. That public process — related to but separate from the pass program study — would have any potential changes to fares taking place in 2019.
The modeling assumptions from the working group’s recommended option assume 2019 cash fares of $3 for a local trip, $5.25 for a regional trip and $10.50 for a ride on the University of Colorado A Line to Denver International Airport. These specific fares are not being considered by the board at this time. As is the case with the pass program study, any changes in fares would first be reviewed by RTD’s senior leadership team, then approved by its board of directors.
METRO’s People Movement highlights the latest leadership changes, promotions, and personnel news across the public transit, motorcoach, and people mobility sectors.
BART began offering select parking lots to non-BART riders to generate new revenue to help address its FY27 $376M operating budget deficit brought on by remote work.
Drawing on decades of industry experience, Evans-Benson offered insights into the differences between the two, along with tips for better customer engagement and more.
The renewals include continued operations at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida; the PRTC in Virginia; and RTC Washoe in Nevada.
The governor’s proposed auto insurance reforms could save the agency $48 million annually by limiting payouts in crashes where buses are not primarily at fault.
What truly drives the cost of a paratransit fleet? Beyond the purchase price, seven operational factors quietly determine maintenance frequency, downtime, and long-term service reliability. This whitepaper explores how these factors shape lifecycle cost and what agencies should evaluate when selecting paratransit vehicles.
In this conversation, TBC’s Executive Director Ed Redfern, President Corey Aldridge, and Washington Representative Joel Rubin outline the coalition’s key policy priorities, the challenges facing transit agencies, and how industry stakeholders can work together to strengthen the voice of bus transit at the federal level.
Amanda Wanke, who has worked at DART for 10 years, including the past 2½ years as CEO, will join Metro Transit as deputy chief operating officer, operations administration.