What are the main challenges BART is facing according to the workshop?

BART faces a projected $376M deficit for FY27, which cannot be resolved through service cuts and fare increases alone because of high fixed costs and low marginal savings in rail operations.

What would happen if the proposed framework is enacted?

The framework includes specific details on potential station closures and recommends a phased approach to implementing further service cuts if required.

Why can't the deficit be addressed solely with service cuts and fare increases?

Due to rail's high fixed costs and low marginal savings, service cuts and fare increases alone are insufficient to close the projected deficit for FY27.

BART Details Contingency Plans Without Funding

Q: What specific aspects of service did BART staff evaluate for their report?

BART staff evaluated multiple service aspects, including routes, stations, headways, peak, evening, and weekend service, as well as hours of operation.

Because rail has high fixed costs and low marginal savings, it is impossible to close the projected FY27 $376M deficit with service cuts and fare increases alone, said agency officials.

by Staff

February 9, 2026

A BART railcar — BART staff evaluated multiple aspects of service, including routes, stations, headways, peak, evening, and weekend service, and hours of operation.
Credit:
BART

1 min to read

BART staff presented contingency plans to handle a projected FY27 $376M deficit, highlighting that service cuts and fare increases alone won't suffice.
The proposed framework details potential station closures and a phased approach to further service reductions if new funding sources aren't identified.
Staff assessed various service elements, such as routes and peak hours, to plan for alternative service frameworks if the 2026 ballot measure fails.

*AI Generated Content

At the annual Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Board Workshop, staff presented directors with detailed plans for an alternative service framework if a November 2026 ballot measure fails and no other operating revenue source is identified for the Oakland, California-based agency.

During the workshop, staff outlined the risks and trade-offs associated with service and non-service reductions.

Because rail has high fixed costs and low marginal savings, it is impossible to close the projected FY27 $376M deficit with service cuts and fare increases alone, said agency officials.

Gathering Data for the Report

BART staff evaluated multiple aspects of service, including routes, stations, headways, peak, evening, and weekend service, and hours of operation.

The proposed framework outlines, for the first time, specific details, including which stations would need to be closed due to insufficient operating funds and the recommended phased approach to triggering further cuts.

The plan retains as many riders as possible, while still cutting service to realize savings. System support services would need to be reduced by 40%, as the resulting loss of fare revenue would largely offset cost savings from cutting services.

After receiving feedback from Directors at the workshop, staff plans to return to the Board on February 26 with a resolution to adopt a finalized alternative service framework that would be implemented if new funding is not secured.

Q&A

The BART Board Workshop is held to discuss detailed plans and strategies if a November 2026 ballot measure fails and no other operating revenue source is identified for the agency.