METRO Magazine Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

A campus-centered service unifies the community

In 2008, the Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District (MTD) increased the frequency on a popular route, focusing on the center portion that supported the largest number of boardings and alightings and branded it the GREENhopper. While MTD designs its service to satisfy many populations, this experiment was directed toward the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign campus.

Amy Snyder
Amy SnyderCommunications Specialist, Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District
Read Amy's Posts
August 9, 2013
A campus-centered service unifies the community

University of Illinois students wait to board at the Illini Union on Green Street. This stop is central to campus and MTD service.

4 min to read


University of Illinois students wait to board at the Illini Union on Green Street. This stop is central to campus and MTD service.

It began with an experiment in 2008. The Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District (MTD) took a popular route, the 5 Green, and increased its frequency. But instead of investing in the entire route, we focused on the center portion that supported the largest number of boardings and alightings. This portion, the meat of the route, operated between three major nodes of service. This abbreviated routing transported riders from the center of our district to both downtown areas that lie to the east and west.

MTD branded it the GREENhopper and it increased frequency on the shared portion of the route from 30 minutes to 15 minutes. While we design our service to satisfy many populations, this experiment was directed toward the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UI) campus.

Green Street, which the 5 Green runs mostly along, is at the very center of the UI campus as well as the center of the twin cities we serve, Champaign and Urbana. Once outside the campus boundaries, Green Street runs near both downtown areas. Apartments and small homes are sprinkled all along the way, many of which are inhabited by University affiliates. Green Street is attractive to serve because it has thorough infill development.

UI students, faculty, and staff make up a majority of our ridership during the months of the fall and spring semesters. The investment of increased frequency via the GREENhopper sought to increase connectivity between the three major nodes as well as simplify service. Since most UI riders were traveling within those boundaries, they often did not have to worry about catching the full Green versus the GREENhopper — both options worked. We theorized that this simplification, coupled with increased frequency, would lead to increased ridership.

For four years, MTD ran the GREENhopper during the weekdays, weekday evenings, and Saturday evenings only when the University of Illinois was in session. The full Green continued to run year round and also ran Saturdays and Sundays during the day.

The Green and GREENhopper take riders to MTD’s intermodal facility, Illinois Terminal, in downtown Champaign. Many riders are within walking distance of their destination already or may easily make a transfer.

Each year ridership grew on both the GREENhopper and the Green. Every hour nearly every trip would end up with standing room only once the route had left campus to travel east to downtown Urbana or west to downtown Champaign. With so many trip generators along the route, the doubled frequency gave riders greater mobility creativity.

Soon community members who stayed in Champaign-Urbana year-round began to resent the loss of the GREENhopper during UI breaks, especially during the three months of summer vacation. Some 15,000 people are employed by the University year-round. But there were other non-UI affiliates who came to rely on its speed to get them quickly between the two downtowns. We began to hear rumblings: MTD favors the UI students. MTD ranks campus a higher priority than the community. The service is designed around the University.

These complaints are not altogether untrue. Since 1989, MTD has worked with the UI administration to contract unlimited access to our fixed-route service for the students and a separate contract for faculty, staff, and retirees. As mentioned above, this population is central to our ridership as well as our funding source. Without this partnership, residents of the cities we serve would not have nearly the level of service they currently enjoy.

The population of our district is approximately 130,000 and UI enrollment is 42,000. For a combined population of just 172,000, MTD turned around 12,028,172 rides in fiscal year 2013. In 2008, at the start of the GREENhopper experiment, MTD provided 9,365,436 rides. That’s nearly a 25% increase in ridership in four years.

But all the justifications aside, we appreciated the community’s demand. So for our new service year, which begins August 18, MTD is proud to announce year-round GREENhopper service. And to boot, we are extending the western portion of the route to transport passengers to two additional nodes. The first is a major shopping center and the second a community college.

This service expansion comes with a nearly $500,000 price tag. But through our experiment over the last four years, MTD staff easily justified the expansion to our board of trustees. The best part has been sharing the news with the community.

At a recent public hearing, one attendee stared back at me with disbelief when I shared the new service map for the GREENhopper. I could see the wheels turning in her head as she imagined all the trip possibilities opening up for her and her family. This stunned silence faded quickly. She snapped back and replied, “Good! I’ve been asking you all for that for years!”

The success of the GREENhopper has spawned a YELLOWhopper, ORANGEhopper, and GOLDhopper. All of the Hoppers increase frequency for both campus and community riders along the heaviest traveled portions of their parent route (Yellow, Orange, and Gold).

Offering decreased headway while minimizing the investment of an entire route has proved successful for our entire district.

Ad Loading...

In case you missed it...

Read our METRO blog, "Sun Tran: Pioneering sustainability in Arizona."

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Blog Posts

Transit Dispatchesby Dan Verbsky January 26, 2026

How Digital Signage is Reshaping the Traveler Experience at Transportation Hubs

What was once a landscape of static signs has evolved into a responsive, immersive environment powered by real-time visual communication.

Read More →
Transit Dispatchesby Giles BaileyDecember 19, 2025

Latest Trends in Urban Mobility from Polis Conference 2025

Polis comprises cities and regions, as well as corporate partners, from across Europe, promoting the development and implementation of sustainable mobility. This year’s event had over a thousand attendees across various policy forums and an exhibition.

Read More →
Transit Dispatchesby Timothy MenardOctober 29, 2025

Why Transit Leaders Require Better Tools for Operational Clarity In Today’s Tech-Fragmented Environment

Across North America and beyond, transit agency officials are contending with a perfect storm of operational headaches and strategic challenges that hamper daily service and long-term progress.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Transit Dispatchesby Colin Parent October 22, 2025

The Powerless Brokers: Why California Can’t Build Transit

It is no secret that transit in the U.S. is slow and expensive to build.

Read More →
Transit Dispatchesby Anna AllwrightSeptember 24, 2025

Why Transport Sustainability Should Focus on People Instead of Cars

Simply incentivizing electrification is not enough to make a meaningful impact; we must shift our focus toward prioritizing public transportation and infrastructure.

Read More →
Transit Dispatchesby Timothy MenardSeptember 2, 2025

Transit ROI & System Efficiencies Will Drive 'Big, Beautiful' Transit Funding

For many years, the narrative surrounding public transit improvements has been heavily weighted toward environmental gains and carbon reduction. While these are undeniably crucial long-term benefits, the immediate focus of this new funding environment is firmly on demonstrable system efficiencies and a clear return on investment.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Transit Dispatchesby Mark R. AeschAugust 12, 2025

Getting Better on Purpose

The notion of agencies being over- or underfunded, I argued, doesn’t hold up. If an agency wants to turn up the heat — to grow beyond the status quo — it must demonstrate measurable value.

Read More →
Transit Dispatchesby Mark R. AeschJuly 15, 2025

The Fiscal Lessons of Goldilocks

Some agencies might suggest they are funded in the public transportation space. Some complain that they are funded too little. I have never heard a public transportation executive proclaim that they are funded too much. And if no public agencies are funded too much, then, by definition, none are funded too little. To steal from Goldilocks’ thinking, they are all funded just right.

Read More →
Transit Dispatchesby Giles BaileyJuly 1, 2025

UITP Congress Charts the Next Era of Public Transport

From East Asia to Europe, more than 400 exhibitors and 70 sessions tackled global mobility challenges — highlighting AI, automation, and urban transit equity in the race toward a carbon-free future.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Transit Dispatchesby Laramie Bowron June 25, 2025

Why Bus Service Cuts Should Be the Last Resort for Transit Agencies

A closer look at ridership trends, demographic shifts, and the broader impacts of service reductions reveals why maintaining, and even improving, bus service levels should be a top priority in 2025.

Read More →
Ad Loading...