The notion of agencies being over- or underfunded, I argued, doesn’t hold up. If an agency wants to turn up the heat — to grow beyond the status quo — it must demonstrate measurable value.
TriMet in Portland established a measurable and prioritized goal to improve its customer satisfaction.
Photo: TriMet
3 min to read
San Antonio's VIA, with industry-leading customer satisfaction, secured a fantastic ballot proposition victory to enhance its high-quality experience.
Photo: VIA
Last time, I shared a perspective on what I call the “Goldilocks principle” of public funding: public agencies are funded just right.
The notion of agencies being over- or underfunded, I argued, doesn’t hold up. If an agency wants to turn up the heat — to grow beyond the status quo — it must demonstrate measurable value.
Ad Loading...
Examples of such agencies exist across the country.
San Antonio, with industry-leading customer satisfaction, secured a fantastic ballot proposition victory to enhance its high-quality experience.
Toledo, with community value scores exceeding 93%, similarly enjoyed community investment to expand, regardless of its current 3% ridership levels.
Improvement in Action
In June, we hosted our 2nd Annual TransDASH Performance Summit, recognizing and learning from transit agencies that are both leading and demonstrating the most improved performance.
The fundamental truth of these agencies is that they got better on purpose. A list of those recognized is below.
1. FACTS: CDTA in Albany has an astonishing 94% Community Value score — almost 9% above the industry average. Albany leadership achieves such tremendous support because they are focused on the community’s story versus their own. The facts make clear that Capital District residents overwhelmingly support CDTA because the agency:
Ad Loading...
Connects people to jobs.
Provides mobility for the elderly and disabled.
Supports opportunities for low-income households.
CDTA leans into those priorities and avoids talk of the ADA being "an unfunded mandate" or how to attract "more choice riders."
2.FOCUS: With 2.8 customer trips per revenue mile, Long Beach Transit has designed service to match customer demand better than most mid-sized agencies that are stuck at close to an average of only one trip per mile. Over the last 10 years nationally, demand is down 28%, yet supply is only down 1%. The mismatch between supply and demand has created the so-called "fiscal cliff,” creating immense operational inefficiencies. Long Beach focuses on taking a much different approach, matching supply with demand, and their intentionality has earned them best in class for efficiency.
3.FIX: TriMet in Portland established a measurable and prioritized goal to improve its customer satisfaction. The result: it jumped 15%. The headline in this success, however, is that they achieved this by focusing on the right KPIs (inputs) in the correct order to produce their desired outcome (higher customer satisfaction). TriMet leadership didn't chase noise from newspaper articles or elected officials; they focused on the right things by following the clear facts, which led to them leading the nation in the highest customer satisfaction improvement.
CDTA in Albany has an astonishing 94% Community Value score — almost 9% above the industry average.
Learning from the Best
It is wonderful to select a limited number of outcomes and then focus your agency on becoming best in class on that limited portfolio. But there can only be one leader:
We should know who that is — so we can all learn.
The goal is to improve — to get better on purpose — in the areas we have prioritized.
Learn from those who are producing measurable value.
Ad Loading...
The facts bear out that 84% of Americans support public transportation. And they are very clear as to why.
And, they don't care a bit if we move just 4% of the total population. Telling the story of the 84% is what will make Goldilocks' porridge "just right."
Polis comprises cities and regions, as well as corporate partners, from across Europe, promoting the development and implementation of sustainable mobility. This year’s event had over a thousand attendees across various policy forums and an exhibition.
Across North America and beyond, transit agency officials are contending with a perfect storm of operational headaches and strategic challenges that hamper daily service and long-term progress.
Simply incentivizing electrification is not enough to make a meaningful impact; we must shift our focus toward prioritizing public transportation and infrastructure.
For many years, the narrative surrounding public transit improvements has been heavily weighted toward environmental gains and carbon reduction. While these are undeniably crucial long-term benefits, the immediate focus of this new funding environment is firmly on demonstrable system efficiencies and a clear return on investment.
Some agencies might suggest they are funded in the public transportation space. Some complain that they are funded too little. I have never heard a public transportation executive proclaim that they are funded too much. And if no public agencies are funded too much, then, by definition, none are funded too little. To steal from Goldilocks’ thinking, they are all funded just right.
From East Asia to Europe, more than 400 exhibitors and 70 sessions tackled global mobility challenges — highlighting AI, automation, and urban transit equity in the race toward a carbon-free future.
A closer look at ridership trends, demographic shifts, and the broader impacts of service reductions reveals why maintaining, and even improving, bus service levels should be a top priority in 2025.