METRO Magazine Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

2019's Cities with the Best (and Worst) Public Transportation

Ranks 100 U.S. cities across three key dimensions: Accessibility; Convenience; Safety; Reliability; and Public Transit Resources.

by Adam McCann
January 2, 2020
2019's Cities with the Best (and Worst) Public Transportation

Seattle ranked as the "best" city for public transportation in the U.S. in a new report from WalletHub.

Photo: King County Metro

7 min to read


Public transportation may be a simple convenience or an absolute daily necessity, depending on the city and the size of its population. The scope of public transportation in giant metropolises like New York City can be massive.

According to the MTA, the New York City subway has over 665 mainland track miles and transports over 1.75 billion passengers per year. That’s not to mention the city’s 5,700 buses that carry over 760 million passengers per year.

Ad Loading...

There are many benefits to using public transportation over personal vehicles. The first is economic growth. According to the American Public Transportation Association, “every $1 invested in public transportation generates $4 in economic returns.” In addition, the APTA states that taking public transportation is cheaper in the long run than buying a vehicle and paying for its upkeep and gas costs. Public transportation also has drastically lower odds of an accident than driving a personal vehicle and helps to cut down pollution from emissions.

But not all cities have the same quality of public transportation. To find out where passengers will fare best during their daily commute, WalletHub compared 100 cities across 17 key metrics. Our data set ranges from share of commuters who use public transit and average age of the fleet to number of injuries and peak hours spent in congestion.

Main Findings

Cities with the Best Public Transportation

Overall Rank (1=Best)

City

Total Score

‘Accessibility & Convenience’ Rank 

‘Safety & Reliability’ Rank

‘Public Transit Resources’ Rank

1

Seattle, WA

77.97

7

6

3

2

Boston, MA

77.84

2

34

10

3

San Francisco, CA

75.21

1

27

80

4

Washington, DC

71.23

3

48

52

5

Madison, WI

71.06

46

1

4

6

Jersey City, NJ

69.05

4

22

97

7

New York, NY

68.87

5

22

97

8

Reno, NV

68.13

76

8

1

9

Honolulu, HI

67.85

30

13

12

10

Portland, OR

66.82

13

31

29

11

Minneapolis, MN

66.72

8

51

31

12

Denver, CO

65.98

14

25

27

13

Oakland, CA

65.68

10

27

80

14

Los Angeles, CA

64.79

15

15

60

15

San Jose, CA

64.47

21

21

35

16

Boise, ID

64.45

82

3

37

17

Lubbock, TX

64.33

92

14

5

18

Milwaukee, WI

64.18

42

4

18

19

San Diego, CA

64.13

32

11

15

20

Austin, TX

63.66

19

68

2

21

Baltimore, MD

63.50

12

35

79

22

Chicago, IL

63.33

6

71

59

23

Lincoln, NE

63.10

24

20

46

24

Chula Vista, CA

62.46

89

11

15

25

Laredo, TX

61.52

99

5

43

26

Santa Ana, CA

61.48

35

15

60

27

Long Beach, CA

61.25

38

15

60

28

Omaha, NE

60.93

69

1

93

29

Wichita, KS

60.76

66

7

30

30

Newark, NJ

60.17

16

22

97

31

Memphis, TN

60.14

58

10

87

32

St. Paul, MN

59.00

27

51

31

33

Pittsburgh, PA

58.96

39

53

33

34

El Paso, TX

58.51

61

40

45

35

Fremont, CA

58.29

43

27

80

36

Greensboro, NC

58.21

57

43

36

37

Cincinnati, OH

58.17

37

42

40

38

Irvine, CA

57.88

70

15

60

39

Toledo, OH

57.77

77

58

7

40

Albuquerque, NM

57.67

11

88

19

41

San Antonio, TX

57.63

49

55

6

42

Aurora, CO

57.60

81

25

27

43

Corpus Christi, TX

57.43

54

67

8

44

Anaheim, CA

57.16

74

15

60

45

San Bernardino, CA

56.94

60

32

49

46

Cleveland, OH

56.65

18

73

53

47

Atlanta, GA

56.47

22

41

96

48

Riverside, CA

56.37

65

32

49

49

Birmingham, AL

56.15

97

30

44

50

Durham, NC

56.06

36

49

66

51

Las Vegas, NV

56.06

44

37

76

52

Miami, FL

55.86

20

45

94

53

Tucson, AZ

55.85

33

57

41

54

Detroit, MI

55.47

52

47

73

55

Phoenix, AZ

55.39

26

61

67

56

Orlando, FL

55.07

25

78

38

57

Lexington-Fayette, KY

54.96

63

77

11

58

Anchorage, AK

54.88

50

54

42

59

Fort Wayne, IN

54.85

88

50

55

60

Colorado Springs, CO

54.66

79

72

9

61

Jacksonville, FL

54.16

62

36

83

62

Columbus, OH

54.13

45

59

54

63

Buffalo, NY

53.91

40

56

75

64

Stockton, CA

53.82

90

9

84

65

Dallas, TX

53.78

29

79

20

66

Nashville, TN

53.73

31

60

85

67

Scottsdale, AZ

53.32

68

61

67

68

Houston, TX

53.32

34

70

65

69

North Las Vegas, NV

52.72

94

37

76

70

Sacramento, CA

52.09

51

44

90

71

Virginia Beach, VA

51.99

47

74

56

72

Winston-Salem, NC

51.63

85

69

14

73

Raleigh, NC

51.42

41

89

13

74

Norfolk, VA

51.18

48

74

56

75

Irving, TX

51.12

56

79

20

76

Glendale, AZ

50.84

98

61

67

77

Garland, TX

50.38

84

79

20

78

Hialeah, FL

50.28

83

45

94

79

Fresno, CA

50.22

71

87

26

80

Henderson, NV

50.09

95

37

76

81

Louisville, KY

49.83

64

85

47

82

Chandler, AZ

49.55

80

61

67

83

Chesapeake, VA

49.38

93

74

56

84

Fort Worth, TX

49.26

75

79

20

85

Plano, TX

49.13

78

79

20

86

Mesa, AZ

49.00

86

61

67

87

Bakersfield, CA

48.98

59

86

74

88

Kansas City, MO

48.76

23

93

34

89

Philadelphia, PA

48.73

9

97

86

90

Gilbert, AZ

48.52

100

61

67

91

St. Louis, MO

46.51

17

96

51

92

Baton Rouge, LA

46.26

91

91

17

93

Arlington, TX

45.70

96

79

20

94

Oklahoma City, OK

45.64

55

90

89

95

Tulsa, OK

43.02

72

94

48

96

New Orleans, LA

42.43

28

92

100

97

Charlotte, NC

40.67

53

95

88

98

Tampa, FL

24.69

67

98

91

99

St. Petersburg, FL

24.03

73

98

91

100

Indianapolis, IN

21.13

87

100

39

Survey Methodology

To determine the cities with the best and worst public transportation systems, WalletHub compared a sample of 100 U.S. cities across three key dimensions: 1) Accessibility & Convenience, 2) Safety & Reliability and 3) Public Transit Resources.

We evaluated those dimensions using 17 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable living conditions.

Ad Loading...

Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order the cities in our sample. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.

Accessibility & Convenience – Total Points: 40

  • Share of Commuters Who Use Public Transit: Double Weight (~6.15 Points)

  • Average Commute Time for Transit Users: Full Weight (~3.08 Points)

  • Average Car Commute Time as Share of Average Public Transport Commute Time: Double Weight (~6.15 Points)

Ad Loading...
  • Transit Connectivity Index: Full Weight (~3.08 Points) Note: The TCI is a measure of how connected the average household member is to the availability of a transit ride.

  • Jobs Accessible Within a 30 Minute Transit Commute per 100 Civilian Employed Residents: Full Weight (~3.08 Points)

  • Peak Hours Spent in Congestion: Full Weight (~3.08 Points) Note: The total number of hours lost in congestion during peak commute periods compared to free-flow periods on a per capita basis. Peak corresponds to the absolute worst portion of the morning and afternoon commute, while free-flow is the best performance experienced over 24 hours.

  • Annual Public Transport Cost as Share of Median Annual Household Income: Double Weight (~6.15 Points)

  • Share of Commuters Who Prefer Public Transport: Full Weight (~3.08 Points) Note: This refers to commuters that choose public transportation even if they have one or more vehicles available.

Ad Loading...
  • Presence of Dedicated Rapid Bus & Rail Transport: Full Weight (~3.08 Points) Note: This binary metric measures the presence or absence of dedicated rapid bus and rail systems in a city.

  • Airport Accessibility by Public Transit: Full Weight (~3.08 Points) Note: This binary metric measures the presence or absence of a direct fixed-guideway access to an airport terminal or free bus shuttle access from rail station to an airport terminal.

Safety & Reliability – Total Points: 40

  • Public Transit Safety and Security Events per Passenger Miles Traveled: Full Weight (~10.00 Points) Note: Events include the following: collision, derailment, fire, security and not otherwise classified events.

  • Public Transit Injuries per Passenger Miles Traveled: Full Weight (~10.00 Points)

  • Public Transit Fatalities per Passenger Miles Traveled: Double Weight (~20.00 Points)

Ad Loading...

Public Transit Resources – Total Points: 20

  • Public Transport System Total Fixed Guideway Directional Route Miles per Urbanized Area Population: Full Weight (~4.00 Points) Note: The mileage in each direction over which public transportation vehicles travel while in revenue service.

  • Total Public Transit Vehicles Operated in Annual Maximum Service per Service Area Population: Double Weight (~8.00 Points) Note: The number of revenue vehicles operated to meet the annual maximum service requirement.

  • Average Age of Public Transit Fleet: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)

  • Average Lifetime Miles per Active Vehicles: Full Weight (~4.00 Points) Note: The total miles accumulated on all active vehicles since date of manufacture divided by the number of active vehicles.

Ad Loading...

Article, originally posted Sept.10, 2019, reprinted with permission from WalletHub.com

More Management

Railby StaffFebruary 2, 2026

Chicago Region Transit Ridership Grows in 2025

The region’s fixed-route system finished out the year with a total of 373.5 million rides. Adding 12.3 million rides over 2024 represents an increase that is equal to the annual transit ridership of Kansas City.

Read More →
New Mobilityby StaffJanuary 30, 2026

Chicago's Pace Expands VanGo Mobility Program

The service is a flexible, reservation-based transit service designed to close the first- and last-mile gaps and connect riders to employment for just $5 per day.

Read More →
A blue and white graphic with text reading "Foothill Gold Line: Design Contract Award & 2026 Board Leadership."
Managementby StaffJanuary 30, 2026

Foothill Gold Line Board Awards Claremont Extension Design Contract to Parsons, Maintains Board Leadership for 2026

Parsons wins the $60M Claremont Extension design contract as the Foothill Gold Line board reaffirms leadership during a pivotal project phase.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Technologyby StaffJanuary 29, 2026

Houston METRO Introduces RideMETRO Fare System

The upgraded system, which went live earlier this month, supports METRO’s METRONow vision to enhance the customer experience, improve service reliability, and strengthen long-term regional mobility.

Read More →
Managementby StaffJanuary 29, 2026

Valley Metro Sees Strong Ridership Growth in 2025

The agency ranked top five among mid-sized U.S. transit systems, defined as agencies with 15 million to 50 million annual trips.

Read More →
A b2x rewards logo and graphic reading "Read. Learn. Earn."
Managementby StaffJanuary 29, 2026

Bobit Business Media Launches B2X Rewards to Engage Transit Industry Professionals

The new program rewards B2B audience readers for engaging with trusted content and suppliers, earning them points toward events, travel, and more.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Busby StaffJanuary 29, 2026

Subway Customer Satisfaction Reaches Record High, New York MTA Says

The subway system saw increases across all key metrics, with 62% of subway riders reporting they feel satisfied with the system overall.

Read More →
Busby StaffJanuary 28, 2026

New Orleans RTA Reaches Agreement with ATU

The agreement provides competitive wages and reflects strong labor-management collaboration, positive working relationships, and a shared commitment to building a world-class transit system for the community, said RTA CEO Lona Edwards Hankins.

Read More →
Managementby StaffJanuary 27, 2026

Keolis Retains Virginia Railway Express Contract

The new contract for Keolis and VRE will commence in July 2026, with the potential to expand to 15 years.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Busby StaffJanuary 27, 2026

California's OCTA Advances 2026 Initiatives Centered on Balance and Sustainability

The priorities are outlined in the 2026 Board and CEO Initiatives and Action Plan, which serves as a roadmap to guide the agency’s work throughout the year and ensure continued progress and accountability on voter-approved transportation investments and essential mobility services.

Read More →